2014
DOI: 10.11607/prd.1920
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Mucogingival Technique for the Treatment of Multiple Recession Defects in the Mandibular Anterior Region: A Case Series with a 2-Year Follow-Up

Abstract: In the mandibular anterior area, gingival recession can be associated with a minimal amount or lack of attached gingiva, a shallow vestibule, and high frenum insertion. These anatomical features may preclude the use of traditional root coverage procedures. This case series describes a a bilaminar technique with flap incision in the fornix for the treatment of adjacent gingival recession defects in patients with a shallow vestibule. It achieved high predictability in complete root coverage without decreasing th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
17
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies using subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) on multiple Miller Class I and II gingival recession defects show mean percent root coverage ranging from 77 to 98%, with only 4 out of 17 studies reporting less than 90% [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Other than coronally positioned flaps, flap designs used include tunnel technique [12,13], modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique [26], modified coronally advanced flap (MCAF) technique by Zucchelli and De Sanctis [17,29], and a modified coronally positioned flap with a horizontal incision in the alveolar mucosa [20].…”
Section: Root Coverage Procedures and Predictability Subepithelial Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Studies using subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) on multiple Miller Class I and II gingival recession defects show mean percent root coverage ranging from 77 to 98%, with only 4 out of 17 studies reporting less than 90% [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Other than coronally positioned flaps, flap designs used include tunnel technique [12,13], modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique [26], modified coronally advanced flap (MCAF) technique by Zucchelli and De Sanctis [17,29], and a modified coronally positioned flap with a horizontal incision in the alveolar mucosa [20].…”
Section: Root Coverage Procedures and Predictability Subepithelial Comentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other than coronally positioned flaps, flap designs used include tunnel technique [12,13], modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique [26], modified coronally advanced flap (MCAF) technique by Zucchelli and De Sanctis [17,29], and a modified coronally positioned flap with a horizontal incision in the alveolar mucosa [20]. While most studies evaluated their outcome between 6 and 12 months postoperatively, 5-year results were reported by Zucchelli et al with mean root coverage of 97% [22].…”
Section: Root Coverage Procedures and Predictability Subepithelial Comentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During a coronally positioned flap (CPF) surgery, passive surgical positioning of the flap is difficult because of the shallow labial vestibule, high frenum attachment, and mentalis muscle activity. Therefore, it is difficult to achieve complete root coverage (CRC), and recurrence after surgery is high [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pre- and postoperative standardized radiographs were taken to evaluate the interproximal alveolar bone level. The surgical procedure was not scheduled until the recession defects did not display either plaque deposits or bleeding on probing 20 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%