A Multi-Agent System Approach in Evaluating Human Spatio-Temporal Vulnerability to Seismic Risk Using Social Attachment

Abstract

Social attachment theory states that individuals seek the proximity of attachment figures (e.g. family members, friends, colleagues, familiar places or objects) when faced with threat. During disasters, this means that family members may seek each other before evacuating, gather personal property before heading to familiar exits and places, or follow groups/crowds, etc. This hard-wired human tendency should be considered in the assessment of risk and the creation of disaster management plans. Doing so may result in more realistic evacuation procedures and may minimise the number of casualties and injuries. In this context, a dynamic spatio-temporal analysis of seismic risk is presented using SOLACE, a multi-agent model of pedestrian behaviour based on social attachment theory implemented using the Belief-Desire-Intention approach. The model focuses on the influence of human, social, physical and temporal factors on successful evacuation. Human factors considered include perception and mobility defined by age. Social factors are defined by attachment bonds, social groups, population distribution, and cultural norms. Physical factors refer to the location of the epicentre of the earthquake, spatial distribution/layout and attributes of environmental objects such as buildings, roads, barriers (cars), placement of safe areas, evacuation routes, and the resulting debris/damage from the earthquake. Experiments tested the influence of time of the day, presence of disabled persons and earthquake intensity. Initial results show that factors that influence arrivals in safe areas include (a) human factors (age, disability, speed), (b) pre-evacuation behaviours, (c) perception distance (social attachment, time of day), (d) social interaction during evacuation, and (e) physical and spatial aspects, such as limitations imposed by debris (damage), and the distance to safe areas. To validate the results, scenarios will be designed with stakeholders, who will also take part in the definition of a serious game. The recommendation of this research is that both social and physical aspects should be considered when defining vulnerability in the analysis of risk.

An Agent-Based Co-modeling Approach to Simulate the Evacuation of a Population in the Context of a Realistic Flooding Event: A Case Study in Hanoi (Vietnam)

“…In this case, the safety zone may not require massive displacement but rather the proper protective behavior [61]. While the first set of models heavily rely on mobility modeling (including pedestrians, motorised traffic or multi-modal mobility) [18], social and individual responses to the alert system [54], or a global infrastructure/resource management [22], the other part of the ABM effort pays more attention to in-situ individual and collective behaviors including socio-cognitive and emotional aspects [8,2,6,60]. In recent years, several models explore the outcome of combined vertical and horizontal evacuations [44,66] even if research efforts to support this trend remain limited.…”

Simulating, Off-Chain and On-Chain: Agent-Based Simulations in Cross-Organizational Business Processes

“…Furthermore, agent-based simulations (ABS) emerged as a powerful support tool, helping decision-makers to cope with complex and changing environments. Examples of successful ABS applications include the development of rural areas [21], the modeling population of displacement and its consequences [22], and crisis and disaster management [23,24].…”

Modeling and Simulating Pedestrian Social Group Behavior with Heterogeneous Social Relationships

“…A limitation of this model is that all groups are represented in the same way, regardless of the social relationship within the group. Bañgate et al (2018) implemented social attachment theory with a multi-agent system. Their model integrates social relationships (e.g.…”