2019
DOI: 10.1109/tvt.2019.2900357
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Carrier-Frequency Random-Transmission Chirp Sequence for TDM MIMO Automotive Radar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation parameters are set as follows, carrier frequency f 0 = 77 GHz, bandwidth B = 1 GHz and the corresponding range resolution Δ R = 0.15 m, therefore the range error is 0.075 m. In the simulation, a phased array with N = 8 antennas is used, and the practical radar system is a time‐division MIMO radar [8] including two transmitters and four receivers, which can generate 8 virtual antennas. The practical radar system and testing scenario are shown in Figs.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The simulation parameters are set as follows, carrier frequency f 0 = 77 GHz, bandwidth B = 1 GHz and the corresponding range resolution Δ R = 0.15 m, therefore the range error is 0.075 m. In the simulation, a phased array with N = 8 antennas is used, and the practical radar system is a time‐division MIMO radar [8] including two transmitters and four receivers, which can generate 8 virtual antennas. The practical radar system and testing scenario are shown in Figs.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The azimuth angle can be estimated bŷ In the simulation, a phased array with N = 8 antennas is used, and the practical radar system is a time-division MIMO radar [8] including two transmitters and four receivers, which can generate 8 virtual antennas. The practical radar system and testing scenario are shown in Figs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the number of transmitter (TX) components increases, it becomes more difficult to maintain orthogonality. To this end, time division multiplexing (TDM) [3]- [5], [14]- [16], frequency division multiplexing (FDM) [10], [17]- [19], and code division multiplexing (CDM) [20]- [22] have been applied to MIMO radars. Regarding the TDM method, because only one TX out of multiple TX paths transmits a signal at a particular time, this multiplexing method suffers from a loss of processing gain with respect to the number of TX antennas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the TDM method, because only one TX out of multiple TX paths transmits a signal at a particular time, this multiplexing method suffers from a loss of processing gain with respect to the number of TX antennas. Even though there is no bandwidth loss, both the motioninduced error problem [15]- [16], and the Doppler ambiguity limit can arise. In the case of FDM, because all TX paths operate simultaneously, there is no issue about Doppler ambiguity limit as increasing the number of TX antennas.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, some new radar system architectures and waveforms are proposed to benefit the interference mitigation [4]- [10]. The frequency-hopping random chirp (FHRC) FMCW technique [4], [5] and FMCW radar with random repetition interval [6] resets the parameters of the chirp signals (the bandwidth, sweep duration, center frequency, repetition interval) every cycle to result in noise-like frequency responses of mutual interferences after the received signals are downconverted and demodulated. Both techniques would mitigate partial interferences and avoid the appearance of ghost targets caused by mutual interferences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%