1989
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1646552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Centre Study to Evaluate Method Dependency of the International Sensitivity Index of Bovine Thromboplastin

Abstract: SummaryIn The Netherlands, a particular coagulometer method for prothrombin time (PT) determination with reduced sample and reagent volumes is used by 62% of the laboratories controlling oral anticoagulant therapy. This “micro-method” has been calibrated against the manual tilt-tube technique for PT determination by six Dutch laboratories. Each laboratory tested 20 fresh normal blood samples and 60 fresh patient blood samples using both methods with the same batch of bovine thromboplastin reagent, according to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a few published reports (6,7,8) very wide ranges of the (between-run) CV1NR could be observed. It should be realized that CVpsjR depends on the magnitude of the INR and on the reagent/instrument system used.…”
Section: Precision Of Pt and Inrmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a few published reports (6,7,8) very wide ranges of the (between-run) CV1NR could be observed. It should be realized that CVpsjR depends on the magnitude of the INR and on the reagent/instrument system used.…”
Section: Precision Of Pt and Inrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some laboratories, excellent precision was observed with the Thrombotest reagent (ISI ~ 1.0) and the manual (tilt-tube) method (7,8).…”
Section: Precision Of Pt and Inrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the guidelines issued by the World Health Organization (WHO), manufacturers of thromboplastins should provide the International Sensitivity Index (ISI) for their reagents, thus enabling clinical laboratories to convert PT results into INRs [2]. Although it has been shown that specific ISIs are needed for each thromboplastin/coagulometer combination [3][4][5][6][7], the practical implementation is difficult because of the many possible reagent/coagulometer combinations. To overcome this problem, local calibration with lyophilized plasmas, certified in terms of PT values or INR with international standard for thromboplastins, has been proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of TBi, it was found that the same test (or intra-assay) variation in normal plasma ranged between 0.73 and 2.30% for the humanderived reagent, and between 0.06 and 1.30% for the rabbit-derived reagent, while for anticoagulated plasma, the values ranged between 1.11 and 3.45% for human and 1.23 and 2.66% for rabbit thromboplastin. These data do not differ from those reported in studies undertaken with international standard human, rabbit and, most recently, recombinant thromboplastins [15][16][17]. It should be noted that the variation was slightly less in the rabbit TBi, particularly in the case of normal plasmas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 36%
“…Possibly this is due to the same reason, although both variation ranges are within those obtained using 'high-sensitivity' reagents [15][16][17]. In the case of anticoagulated plasma, the same situation arises (1.18-3.25% of variation for human thromboplastin and 1.25-2.56% for rabbit TBi).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%