2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-city air pollution population exposure study: Combined use of chemical-transport and random-Forest models with dynamic population data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is necessary to identify the exposure distribution of air pollutants for an entire population [ 81 , 82 ]. Traditional methods are used to assess the air pollutant exposure of a population by collecting data from outdoor fixed air monitoring stations, and assign them to the home address of an individual using atmospheric dispersion models and spatial interpolation techniques [ 40 , 41 , 83 ]. However, the determination of a population’s exposure to air pollutants using measurements from fixed air monitoring stations may be insufficient in terms of their spatio-temporal resolution [ 83 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is necessary to identify the exposure distribution of air pollutants for an entire population [ 81 , 82 ]. Traditional methods are used to assess the air pollutant exposure of a population by collecting data from outdoor fixed air monitoring stations, and assign them to the home address of an individual using atmospheric dispersion models and spatial interpolation techniques [ 40 , 41 , 83 ]. However, the determination of a population’s exposure to air pollutants using measurements from fixed air monitoring stations may be insufficient in terms of their spatio-temporal resolution [ 83 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional methods are used to assess the air pollutant exposure of a population by collecting data from outdoor fixed air monitoring stations, and assign them to the home address of an individual using atmospheric dispersion models and spatial interpolation techniques [ 40 , 41 , 83 ]. However, the determination of a population’s exposure to air pollutants using measurements from fixed air monitoring stations may be insufficient in terms of their spatio-temporal resolution [ 83 ]. With the development of modern industrial society, sources of pollution and environmental change are becoming increasingly complex and the factors required to be accommodated in the model are increasing; this has led to a rise in calculation costs, uncertainty, and a decline in model accuracy [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daily mean concentrations of air pollutants for the years 2013-2015 at the resolution of 200 m were estimated using an RFMLA as well. The spatiotemporal predictors were the concentration fields computed by a flexible air quality regional (FARM) model, the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Julian day, day of week and month, resident population, mean elevation and daily traffic volumes [18]. The RFMLA model was then applied in two phases: a tuning (or training) phase in which the monitoring sites were used for choosing the best set of model predictors, and a generalization phase aimed to estimate the concentrations elsewhere.…”
Section: Pm 10 and Pm 25 1 Km Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The "Big data in Environmental and occupational EPidemiology" (BEEP) project aimed to assess the health effects of air pollution considering the whole Italian territory, including specific urban, suburban and rural areas, and using measures of air pollutant exposure estimated at residential level, with a resolution of 1 km [15][16][17] and 200 m [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing studies show that machine learning-and deep learning-based models have been widely applied in atmospheric environmental modeling for the monitoring and prediction of air pollutants, such as the multilayer perceptron (MLP) model [26,27], the backpropagation neural network (BPNN) model [28], support vector regression (SVR) [28,29], the random forest (RF) model [30][31][32], the general regression neural network (GRNN) model [28,33], the recurrent neural network (RNN) model [34], and long short-term memory (LSTM)-based models [11,[35][36][37][38]. The careful reasoning process in machine learningbased models (such as MLP, SVR, and RF) is comparable to mathematical reasoning [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%