A multi-criteria assessment of alternative sustainable solid waste management of flexible packaging

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the issues affecting end of life (EOL) management of flexible packaging. It focuses on Sustainable Solid Waste Management by using multi-criteria decision making, analytic network process (ANP), and Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT). Design/methodology/approach Data were collected from 33 expert stakeholders, though a series of interviews and questionnaires. The subject seven aspects were applied from integrated sustainable waste management with 19 sub-criteria identified. Criteria were prioritized by using ANP and SWOT to the internal and external environments of organizations directly responsible for waste management. Findings The five most important factors in the management of flexible packaging waste include: techniques for waste management, material and design, management support, legislation and rule, and environmental care and environmental health, respectively. Solutions addressing flexible packaging waste were identified, including reuse and recycle, waste to energy, biopolymers, new innovative materials and material recovery. Research limitations/implications Data were derived from the national authorities and large companies. The findings may not represent local authorities and small-scale manufacturers. Future research should be conducted, in order to investigate and focus around small manufacturing enterprises. Practical implications The findings provide a strategic framework for policy makers and industrial manufacturers. The benefits of this will enable them to address flexible packaging waste, by using qualitative and quantitative criteria. Originality/value This is the first paper developing a multi-criteria assessment model to specifically manage EOL flexible packaging, a possible pioneering piece of research in this field.

Pythagorean fuzzy combinative distance-based assessment with pure linguistic information and its application to financial strategies of multi-national companies

“…Multi-criteria group decision-making (M.C.G.D.M.) methods are important in solving managerial problems in many areas, ranging from location selection, to supply chain management and financial management (Dorokhov et al, 2018;Liu, He, & Xu, 2019;Pongpimol et al, 2020). These problems are often too complex to be defined in crisp CONTACT Tomas Bale zentis tomas@laei.lt values.…”

Frameworks for reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from municipal solid waste in Oman

“…While there are a variety of ways to reduce this emission, reduction in waste and recycling is one of them (Pongpimol et al, 2020). In fact, there are some studies conducted in Oman which explore the potential of energy production from waste which has a high amount of biomass (Umar, 2018).…”

An exploratory study of green‐lean‐six sigma motivators for environmental sustainability: Managerial insights from a developed and developing economy

“…The reason for considering the FP manufacturing industry in both regions is the increasing environmental burden of this sector in the form of natural resource depletion, plastic waste generation, volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, landfill issues, health and safety hazards and water and soil pollution (Ahamed et al, 2020; Farrukh et al, 2022c). In addition, it is argued that both developed and developing economies are facing serious environmental consequences of this sector resulting from the production and consumption of FP products (Pongpimol et al, 2020). For example, in the context of NZ, around 8% of plastic is found in waste streams, which is much higher as compared to Norway at 2.6%, Canada at 3%, Denmark at 1.6% and Australia at 7.6% (De Bhowmick et al, 2021).…”