A Multi-Criteria Evaluation of Green Spaces in European Cities

Abstract

Green spaces, such as parks, are an essential constituent of urban quality of life. It is noteworthy, however, that some cities have been more successful in implementing a green space policy than others. This article aims to assess the complex and heterogeneous supply of urban green spaces by means of a multidimensional evaluation approach, and to compare the `green performance' of European cities in terms of the present situation, priorities in decision making and planning, and their success level as evaluated by experts in the field. The article examines urban green spaces from the viewpoint of relevant indicators, in particular `quantity and availability of urban green spaces', `changes in green spaces', `planning of urban green spaces',`financing of urban green spaces' and `level of performance', on the basis of a comparison of 24 European cities. It deploys a proper type of multi-criteria analysis for mixed quantitative and qualitative information, coined Regime Analysis.A comparison of urban green spaces in European cities by means of this multi-criteria analysis brings to light the critical elements in green space availability and sets out choice directions based on priorities in decision making and policy evaluation.The results of this Regime Analysis show that when only the indicators on the availability of urban green spaces are used to assess the green performance with a view to a ranking of European cities, the Southern European cities are in the lead. However, when the planning performance indicators are also taken into consideration, the Northern European cities appear to have higher scores.

RETRACTED: Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Urban Forest Basal Area under China’s Rapid Urban Expansion and Greening: Implications for Urban Green Infrastructure Management

“…This is why we found the gradual increases of UF from 1984 to 2014. The opposite phenomenon was reported in other regions, like most Eastern European cities and the USA [43][44][45][46]. This difference might be caused by different urban development patterns in different countries.…”

Defining place-keeping: The long-term management of public spaces

“…It is widely acknowledged that there are many benefits to the provision and use of public space in urban 396 areas (Baycan-Levent et al, 2009, Mielke, 2008, as outlined at the beginning of this paper. It therefore 397 follows that this value afforded to public space has to some extent been measured, in different ways such 398 as access to green space and indicators of health and recovery from illness (Kaplan andKaplan, 1989, 399 Mitchell andPopham, 2008).…”

The issues of urban green space in Baia Mare based on tree composition

“…), and the planning values. This value gives the scientific values (education function) and the policy value (financial and public function) [4]. The present study investigates the aesthetic, recreational effects of the research sites, values that affect quality of life, bearing in mind the taxonomical richness of the applied plant material increasing ecological diversity.…”