2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-criteria optimization analysis for Jordan's energy mix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…They ranked alternatives as solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, and hydropower. Malkawi et al applied AHP as a MCDM method to rank electric energy options for Jordan. They developed different scenarios and evaluated energy alternatives according to these scenarios.…”
Section: Use Of Mcdm Methods For Energy Policy and Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They ranked alternatives as solar, wind, biomass, geothermal, and hydropower. Malkawi et al applied AHP as a MCDM method to rank electric energy options for Jordan. They developed different scenarios and evaluated energy alternatives according to these scenarios.…”
Section: Use Of Mcdm Methods For Energy Policy and Decision Makingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Acceptance of residents (C42) [11,43]: Public acceptability expresses the overview of opinions related to the energy systems by the local residents.…”
Section: Social Aspect (C4)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty-five papers out of the reviewed studies integrated hybrid MCDA and fuzzy MCDA with respect to energy management and 49 papers used fuzzy AHP and classical AHP, while 25 papers applied MCDA and MCA techniques. Malkawi et al [17] accessed and classified the electricity generation alternatives for Jordan using AHP. The ranking of the alternatives was based on economic, technical, environmental, social, and risk assessment.…”
Section: Multicriteria Models In Energy Studymentioning
confidence: 99%