“…Breckenfelder et al () defined the SPF at the latitude of the steep slope of the 27.68‐kg/m 3 isopycnal, Desbruyéres et al () defined its position from the longitude at which the 8 °C isotherm intersects the 200‐m horizon at 53°N, and Núñez‐Riboni et al () defined the SPF as the mean latitude at 500‐m depth of the region between 30°W to 50°W and 35°N to 55°N where the magnitude of the horizontal density gradient is larger than its space mean plus 1/4 of its standard deviation. The movement of the SPF following Breckenfelder et al () correlates with the variations of the NASPG area ( r =0.5, with −1‐year lag), following Desbruyéres et al () it correlates with posS in the period 1959–2000 ( r =0.64) and with the area in the period 2001–2017 ( r =0.62, 1‐year lag), lastly following Núñez‐Riboni et al () SPF correlates with the area in 1959–2000 ( r =−0.58, −1‐year lag) and with Ψ v , posE, posS, and area in 2001–2017 ( r =0.7 without a lag, 0.61 with 4‐year lag, 0.73 with 2‐year lag, and 0.7 with 4‐year lag, respectively). In the eastern North Atlantic the SPF and water mass properties in general are more variable, so as noted previously by Foukal and Lozier () the SPF movements might not be captured by the variability of one latitude.…”