2001
DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961014196.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi‐dimensional analysis of cue‐elicited craving in heavy smokers and tobacco chippers

Abstract: Aims-This research examined the performance of a broad range of measures posited to relate to smoking craving.Design-Heavy smokers and tobacco chippers, who were either deprived of smoking or not for 7 hours, were exposed to both smoking (a lit cigarette) and control cues.Participants-Smokers not currently interested in trying to quit smoking (n = 127) were recruited. Heavy smokers (n = 67) averaged smoking at least 21 cigarettes/day and tobacco chippers (n = 60) averaged 1-5 cigarettes on at least 2 days/week… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

22
191
5
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(219 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
22
191
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding is consistent with some other studies (e.g., Rohsenow et al, 2007;Tidey et al, 2005). A methodological concern that has been raised about smoking cuereactivity paradigms is that smoking deprivation alone may raise craving to levels where the cue-reactivity effects are no longer noticeable due to ceiling effects, possibly explaining why weaker reactivity effects have been observed when participants are nicotine deprived as compared to non-deprived (e.g., Sayette et al, 2001;Tidey et al, 2005). However, 10 hours of smoking deprivation in the present study did not obscure cue-reactivity effects in these participants: prior to cue exposure, levels of urge were only moderately high and ratings of withdrawal were low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This finding is consistent with some other studies (e.g., Rohsenow et al, 2007;Tidey et al, 2005). A methodological concern that has been raised about smoking cuereactivity paradigms is that smoking deprivation alone may raise craving to levels where the cue-reactivity effects are no longer noticeable due to ceiling effects, possibly explaining why weaker reactivity effects have been observed when participants are nicotine deprived as compared to non-deprived (e.g., Sayette et al, 2001;Tidey et al, 2005). However, 10 hours of smoking deprivation in the present study did not obscure cue-reactivity effects in these participants: prior to cue exposure, levels of urge were only moderately high and ratings of withdrawal were low.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Practicing this strategy during short periods of abstinence, along with increasing daily physical activity, could promote greater pre-quit urge management skills and reduce quit day, abstinenceinduced cue reactivity.. 5 Nicotine withdrawal was a significant predictor of reactivity with greater withdrawal symptoms associated with increased quit day smoking cue reactivity. This finding is also consistent with the literature indicating that overnight abstinence can increase reactivity to smoking-related cues [64,65]. The nicotine withdrawal syndrome [66] that includes irritability, difficulty concentrating, and restlessness are observed within …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Interventions that reduce RT attentional bias have yet to be identified. Second, attentional bias may provide an additional index of smoking motivation, which could facilitate the derivation of multivariate measures of this construct (Sayette, Martin, Wertz, Shiffman, & Perrott, 2001). Third, the Stroop task may provide a tool for testing theories of addiction (e.g., the incentive sensitization theory).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%