2011
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201117648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-epochXMM-Newtoncampaign on the core of the massive Cygnus OB2 association

Abstract: Context. Cyg OB2 is one of the most massive associations of O-type stars in our Galaxy. Despite the large interstellar reddening towards Cyg OB2, many studies, spanning a wide range of wavelengths, have been conducted to more clearly understand this association. X-ray observations provide a powerful tool to overcome the effect of interstellar absorption and study the most energetic processes associated with the stars in Cyg OB2. Aims. We analyse XMM-Newton data to investigate the X-ray and UV properties of mas… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
38
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
4
38
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To check our results, we looked at the other sources in the Swift field-of-view. Cyg OB2 #5 and 12 are known to vary, but unfortunately, their variations are not fully explained and predictable (Linder et al 2009;Rauw 2011). The behavior of the collidingwind binary Cyg OB2 #8A is, however, well known (De Becker et al 2006;Blomme et al 2010), and the Swift data are here fully consistent with the XMM-Newton and ASCA data, when taking the errors due to a lower number of counts in the Swift data into account.…”
Section: The Spectrasupporting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To check our results, we looked at the other sources in the Swift field-of-view. Cyg OB2 #5 and 12 are known to vary, but unfortunately, their variations are not fully explained and predictable (Linder et al 2009;Rauw 2011). The behavior of the collidingwind binary Cyg OB2 #8A is, however, well known (De Becker et al 2006;Blomme et al 2010), and the Swift data are here fully consistent with the XMM-Newton and ASCA data, when taking the errors due to a lower number of counts in the Swift data into account.…”
Section: The Spectrasupporting
confidence: 50%
“…An annulus could not be used, as numerous X-ray sources can be found in the region (see Rauw 2011). The count rate measured for this new observation is 0.6 cts s −1 for MOS and 1.8 cts s −1 for pn, which is five times higher than in previous observations.…”
Section: Xmm-newtonmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the X-ray brightest PMS candidates, we found f X 0.5 × 10 −13 erg cm −2 s −1 (Table 5) which then translates into L X 3.5 × 10 31 erg s −1 . Whilst this is a relatively high value, it is not unusual for PMS stars in young open clusters, especially during flares (Sana et al 2007;Rauw 2011). We note also that our cross-correlation with catalogues from the literature (see Table A.1) resulted in the association of six X-ray sources with low-mass YSOs identified with WISE (Straižys et al 2013).…”
Section: Other Bright X-ray Sources In the Field Of Viewsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…5.2.) There is furthermore some discussion about the distance to the Cyg OB2 association (e.g., Rauw 2011). A larger distance (1.7-2.0 kpc instead of our assumed 1.45 kpc) would explain the discrepancy equally well.…”
Section: Free-free Contribution Stellar Windsmentioning
confidence: 71%