2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-021-03055-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-fidelity surrogate modeling method based on variance-weighted sum for the fusion of multiple non-hierarchical low-fidelity data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Co-Kriging, 2000 [22,24,30] √ Bayesian HK, 2012 [25] √ Bayesian MCK, 2012 [24] √ Bayesian IHK, 2018 [12] √ Bayesian MVCM, 2015 [19] √ BF GVFM, 2015 [20] √ BF co-BRF, 2017 [40] √ Bayesian MFGP, 2018 [41] √ Bayesian POD-co-Kriging, 2018 [42] √ Bayesian SM-VFM, 2018 [26] √ SM, BF MHK, 2020 [31,32] √ Bayesian MDNN, 2020 [13] √ BF GCK, 2020 [43,44] √ Bayesian TL-VFSM, 2021 [27] √ BF GAN-MDF, 2022 [29] √ BF MMGP, 2021 [45] √ Bayesian WS, PC-DIT, PC-CSC, 2016 [39] √ Bayesian ECK, 2018 [36] √ Bayesian LRMFS, 2018 [37] √ BF VWS-MFS, 2021 [46] √ Bayesian NHLF-co-Kriging, 2022 [38] √ Bayesian Our work (EHK)…”
Section: Granularity Of Lf Datasets Mfsm Framework Type Multi-level N...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-Kriging, 2000 [22,24,30] √ Bayesian HK, 2012 [25] √ Bayesian MCK, 2012 [24] √ Bayesian IHK, 2018 [12] √ Bayesian MVCM, 2015 [19] √ BF GVFM, 2015 [20] √ BF co-BRF, 2017 [40] √ Bayesian MFGP, 2018 [41] √ Bayesian POD-co-Kriging, 2018 [42] √ Bayesian SM-VFM, 2018 [26] √ SM, BF MHK, 2020 [31,32] √ Bayesian MDNN, 2020 [13] √ BF GCK, 2020 [43,44] √ Bayesian TL-VFSM, 2021 [27] √ BF GAN-MDF, 2022 [29] √ BF MMGP, 2021 [45] √ Bayesian WS, PC-DIT, PC-CSC, 2016 [39] √ Bayesian ECK, 2018 [36] √ Bayesian LRMFS, 2018 [37] √ BF VWS-MFS, 2021 [46] √ Bayesian NHLF-co-Kriging, 2022 [38] √ Bayesian Our work (EHK)…”
Section: Granularity Of Lf Datasets Mfsm Framework Type Multi-level N...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Before optimization of the surrogate model, the test set was used to verify the performance of the constructed GA-GRNN surrogate model. The maximum absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), and coefficient of determination R 2 were selected as the indicators to evaluate the performance [28,29]. MAE evaluates the local prediction accuracy of the GA-GRNN model, RMSE evaluates the global prediction accuracy of the GA-GRNN surrogate model, and R 2 evaluates the fit of the GA-GRNN surrogate model.…”
Section: Ga-grnn Surrogate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%