2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2023.101718
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-institutional observational study evaluating the incidence and the clinicopathological characteristics of NeoRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the frequency of ctDNA RAS MT was 40.5% which was associated with high tumor burden, such as liver metastasis and high tumor marker levels. On the contrary, neoRAS, which is de ned as conversion from initially diagnosed RAS MT to WT following treatment, was reportedly associated with the absence of liver metastasis, small tumor diameter, and low tumor markers (Osumi et al 2023). ctDNA RAS MT detectability may depend on tumor volumes, although the reason for association of primary tumor resection with ctDNA RAS MT is not clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the frequency of ctDNA RAS MT was 40.5% which was associated with high tumor burden, such as liver metastasis and high tumor marker levels. On the contrary, neoRAS, which is de ned as conversion from initially diagnosed RAS MT to WT following treatment, was reportedly associated with the absence of liver metastasis, small tumor diameter, and low tumor markers (Osumi et al 2023). ctDNA RAS MT detectability may depend on tumor volumes, although the reason for association of primary tumor resection with ctDNA RAS MT is not clear.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15.6%, compared to 0% in those with ctDNA RAS MT, and patients with ctDNA RAS WT had a signi cantly better prognosis than those with ctDNA RAS MT. According to the results of the CRICKET trial, patients with ctDNA RAS WT had ctDNA prior to anti-EGFR mAb as these gene alterations may be associated with acquired resistance to anti-EGFR mAb.…”
mentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Thus, although some studies have reported EGFR antibody rechallenge using ctDNA assays in recent years, the clinical significance of a RAS -ML in mCRC is not well established. Mutation loss after induction chemotherapy in patients with RAS -MT was between 21.5 and 90% (Klein-Scory et al 2020 ; Sunakawa et al 2022 ; Wang et al 2022 ; Osumi et al 2023 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, ascertaining whether ctDNA could not be detected owing to a diminutive tumor volume and inability to determine metastatic involvement in specific organs remains a significant hurdle. Osumi et al pointed out that conversion to Neo RAS -WT may be more common in patients without liver metastases (Osumi et al 2023 ). Neo RAS -WT is defined as the absence of RAS mutation coupled with trunk mutations of genes such as TP53, APC, or methylated genes (Moati et al 2020 ; Nicolazzo et al 2020 , 2021 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osumi et al [ 39 ] reported a multi-institutional observational study assessing the clinicopathologic features and incidence of NeoRAS WT mCRC. A total of 107 patients with tissue RAS mutation (refractory or intolerant to prior chemotherapy) were enrolled at four institutions.…”
Section: Treatments Targeting Ras Statusmentioning
confidence: 99%