2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-24255-2_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-layer Anomaly Detector for Dynamic Service-Based Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validation experiments are organized as follows: in 40 runs we inject the memory error, while in the other 40 runs the network error is injected, considering different Liferay services involved by the workload as injection points. Regarding the probing system, we observe 55 indicators [6], [22] from three different layers: 23 from the CentOS operating system, 25 from the middleware (the JVM [24]) and 7 from the Network. As explained in Section 3.3, we select the 20 most performing anomaly checkers (and consequently, the most relevant indicators) out of a set of 221 options.…”
Section: Experiments Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The validation experiments are organized as follows: in 40 runs we inject the memory error, while in the other 40 runs the network error is injected, considering different Liferay services involved by the workload as injection points. Regarding the probing system, we observe 55 indicators [6], [22] from three different layers: 23 from the CentOS operating system, 25 from the middleware (the JVM [24]) and 7 from the Network. As explained in Section 3.3, we select the 20 most performing anomaly checkers (and consequently, the most relevant indicators) out of a set of 221 options.…”
Section: Experiments Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the top of Table 4 we summarize precision, recall and F-Scores obtained i) using the framework in [6], ii) introducing the network layer, iii) including the diff data series in addition to the default (value) for each indicator and iv) considering services information in combination with context awareness. Table 4 shows how using context awareness significantly raises the F-Score.…”
Section: Precision and Recall Varying Modulesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations