2017
DOI: 10.1111/jcms.12554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi‐Level Approach to European Identity: Does Integration Foster Identity?

Abstract: Many integration theories predict that heightened integration in Europe will give rise to a European identity. As integration advances, so does the scholarly debate on identity. This article endeavours to contribute to the debate by investigating the relationship between European integration and European identity longitudinally in 14 countries over 21 years from 1992 to 2012. Using Eurobarometer and EU Index data, this relationship is found to be exponential with current integration levels predicting the immin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The study finds that extraversion increases European identity, while agreeableness (in the sense of being gentle and polite) decreases it. Luhmann (2017) finds that pessimists are a lot less likely to feel European.…”
Section: Personality and Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study finds that extraversion increases European identity, while agreeableness (in the sense of being gentle and polite) decreases it. Luhmann (2017) finds that pessimists are a lot less likely to feel European.…”
Section: Personality and Attitudesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most used of these is the notorious 'Moreno question', which contrasts and orders identification with Europe versus national identification (Mitchell, 2015). The thinness of these measures has not deterred several generations of social scientists from repeatedly using them and other similar indicators as a meaningful dependent variable, reducing the positioning of European nationalities to the dimension of overt identification or not with the EU (Citrin and Sides 2004;Fligstein, 2008;Hooghe and Marks, 2008;Kuhn, 2015;Luhmann, 2017;de Vries, 2018). Most of this work has been dedicated to diagnosing the growing crisis of the EU seen in the growing Euroscepticism of some counties, and lamenting the 'democratic deficit' it implies.…”
Section: The Impasse Of European Identity Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, European identity is a difficult construct to gauge, and traditional measures to do so have failed to grasp subjective nuances or the intensity of identification (Kaina 2013;Luhmann 2017aLuhmann , 2017b and to isolate the personal traits and contextual characteristics which predispose individuals to identify themselves with certain supranational entities. To remedy this, Strohmeier et al (2017) argue that young people's identification with the European Union is measurable through its potential to trigger civic and political action, ranging from conventional (intended participation in future EU elections) and nonconventional political engagement (supporting petitions about EU-related issues, partaking in demonstrations and marches, holding sit-ins or symbolic occupations) to psychological engagement (debating EU-related topics in social settings, circulating or commenting on content about EU affairs on social media).…”
Section: Conceptualising European Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%