2017 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2017.8050436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-measurements RO-TDC implemented in a Xilinx field programmable gate array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The architecture of the MMRO‐TDC proposed in [16] measures relative time intervals between multiple signals under test. In the simplified version shown in Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Delay Tuning Methods Applied On An Unbalanced Multi‐mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The architecture of the MMRO‐TDC proposed in [16] measures relative time intervals between multiple signals under test. In the simplified version shown in Fig.…”
Section: Proposed Delay Tuning Methods Applied On An Unbalanced Multi‐mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from saving logic resources, the RO‐TDC architecture helps to improve the linearity of the TDC. Recently, we proposed a multi‐measurement RO‐TDC (MMRO‐TDC) implemented in a Xilinx FPGA [16]. This architecture was supported by a compact implementation suitable for multiple simultaneous measurements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Programmable logic devices, especially FPGA and SoC, allow us to implement TDCs with different kinds of structures. Looking into the literature, we can roughly divide these architectures between TDCs based on feedback (FB) circuits, 34,35 e.g., ring-oscillators, and feedforward (FF) ones based on delay-lines. [34][35][36] The high difference of propagation delay values among combinatorial logic elements, mainly due to the scaling down of technology, favors the implementation of feedforward solutions with respect to the feedback ones.…”
Section: Tdc Ip-corementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Looking into the literature, we can roughly divide these architectures between TDCs based on feedback (FB) circuits, 34,35 e.g., ring-oscillators, and feedforward (FF) ones based on delay-lines. [34][35][36] The high difference of propagation delay values among combinatorial logic elements, mainly due to the scaling down of technology, favors the implementation of feedforward solutions with respect to the feedback ones. To confirm this, we can consider the worsening in resolution from 5 ps to 63.3 ps shown by two TDCs based on a ring-oscillator implemented in 28-nm 34 and 90-nm 35 technology, respectively.…”
Section: Tdc Ip-corementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation