AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) Conference 2013
DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-5172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Mode Upset Recovery Flight Control System for Large Transport Aircraft

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the past decade, NASA has lead a major research effort in Loss of Control (LOC) prevention and mitigation, by gathering and categorizing accident statistics, 14 setting guidelines for research and system requirements, 3 and providing both high angle of attack aerodynamic data and flight dynamic models, 15 spurring research in software enabled envelope protection and upset recovery. [16][17][18][19] Previous research closely related to the present work includes that of Lay (Ref.20), who developed a neural network to predict spin entry. The network used rudder, elevator and yaw rate as inputs and was trained on two sample spins.…”
Section: B Background and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past decade, NASA has lead a major research effort in Loss of Control (LOC) prevention and mitigation, by gathering and categorizing accident statistics, 14 setting guidelines for research and system requirements, 3 and providing both high angle of attack aerodynamic data and flight dynamic models, 15 spurring research in software enabled envelope protection and upset recovery. [16][17][18][19] Previous research closely related to the present work includes that of Lay (Ref.20), who developed a neural network to predict spin entry. The network used rudder, elevator and yaw rate as inputs and was trained on two sample spins.…”
Section: B Background and Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F ull-envelope aircraft models require extensive effort to represent the aerodynamic coefficients well in the entire region of the envelope as flight dynamics beyond stall are highly non-linear and often unstable [1,2]. With upset recovery approaches found in the literature being model-based ( [3][4][5], and references herein) there is a clear need for reliable full-envelope models of flight dynamics. NASA's Generic Transport Model (GTM) has contributed significantly to analysis and control approaches of civil and unmanned aircraft over the entire flight envelope (see, e.g., [6,7]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With their unstable and highly non-linear characterizations, LOC-I situations require extensive control effort and adequate approaches. Non-linear behaviour of aircrafts in the post-stall flight regime has been investigated analytically [3][4][5][6][7] and researchers developed control laws for upset recovery [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. For the recovery approaches found in literature as well as proposed by the authors [18] are model-based, there is a need for reliable flight dynamics data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to its rich and freely available data, NASA's generic transport model (GTM) is well-recognized in aerospace engineering community and widely used in literature [6,7,[14][15][16][19][20][21][22][23]. Representing a 5.5 % down-scaled, typical aerial transport vehicle, the GTM provides an unmanned aerial vehicle [24] with exhaustive, full-envelope aerodynamic data from wind-tunnel studies [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%