2017 Ninth International Conference on Advanced Computing (ICoAC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icoac.2017.8441380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Objective Approach For Dg And Capacitor Placement Using Harmony Search Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alam, Gupta, Bindal, Siddiqui, & M. Zaid, 2018;Amraj, Boonrach, & K. Bhumkittipich, 2021;Siregar, Yuwaldi, Tarmizi, & Akhyar, 2023;Roy, Srivastava, & Dixit, 2020;Venkatraman & Khaitan, 2016;Sridevi, Rani, & B. L. Rao, 2019), and integrated approaches combining both capacitor and DG placement (Imran & Kowsalya, 2014;Chege, K. Murage, & K. Kihato, 2018;Jamil, 2023;Kaur & Jain, 2016). Capacitor placement and DG placement studies have employed methods such as genetic algorithms (Siregar et al, 2023), Tabu search (Rugthaicharoencheep et al, 2012), and harmonic search algorithms (Kona & Kollu, 2017), with a strong emphasis on renewable energy solutions. DG placement literature includes hybrid optimization approaches (Muhtazaruddin et al, 2014), particle swarm optimization (Lee et al, 2015), selective particle swarm optimization (Sarfaraz et al, 2016), Local Search Optimization (Kaushal & Tomar, 2017) and improved multi-objective harmony search algorithms (Kona & Kollu, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alam, Gupta, Bindal, Siddiqui, & M. Zaid, 2018;Amraj, Boonrach, & K. Bhumkittipich, 2021;Siregar, Yuwaldi, Tarmizi, & Akhyar, 2023;Roy, Srivastava, & Dixit, 2020;Venkatraman & Khaitan, 2016;Sridevi, Rani, & B. L. Rao, 2019), and integrated approaches combining both capacitor and DG placement (Imran & Kowsalya, 2014;Chege, K. Murage, & K. Kihato, 2018;Jamil, 2023;Kaur & Jain, 2016). Capacitor placement and DG placement studies have employed methods such as genetic algorithms (Siregar et al, 2023), Tabu search (Rugthaicharoencheep et al, 2012), and harmonic search algorithms (Kona & Kollu, 2017), with a strong emphasis on renewable energy solutions. DG placement literature includes hybrid optimization approaches (Muhtazaruddin et al, 2014), particle swarm optimization (Lee et al, 2015), selective particle swarm optimization (Sarfaraz et al, 2016), Local Search Optimization (Kaushal & Tomar, 2017) and improved multi-objective harmony search algorithms (Kona & Kollu, 2017).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…𝑃 π‘šπ‘‘ is the PV module maximum power defined in (7), 𝑁 𝑠 is the series connected PV modules, 𝑁 𝑝 is the number of parallel connected PV modules. Maximum module power is as defined in (8) where 𝑉 π‘œπ‘ represents voltage at the output terminals of the PV module during open circuit while 𝐼 𝑠𝑐 denotes current during short circuit of the PV module. Fill factor (FF) in ( 4) is the light sensitive area in the solar panel.…”
Section: Solar Dg Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the solutions [7] employs a particle swarm optimization (PSO)-based optimization strategy to reduce loss and facilitate optimal DG placement. The DG placement is a multivariate optimization problem, where methods like harmony search are being utilized over IEEE 33-bus that results minimization of the power loss [8]. The minimization of load consumption by maintaining a threshold voltage is the core objective of a popular energy saving scheme, namely the integration of DG and conservation voltage reduction (CVR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reduce dmax adaptively using (32) Keep the calculated nondominated solutions in the Pareto archive Remove dominated solutions from the archive…”
Section: Yesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [31], the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) and the moth swarm algorithm (MSA) are used and compared to solve the optimal allocation problem of shunt capacitors and DG units; however, WOA results in lower quality solutions and MSA has complicated objective functions. In [32], an improved multiobjective harmony search algorithm (IMOHSA) is used to find the optimal allocation of DG and capacitor; however, it has a high number of iterations. In [33], a combined approach is proposed to solve the proposed issue; however, complicated objective functions are used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%