2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2014.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective assessment of the effect of solar PV array orientation and tilt on energy production and system economics

Abstract: This analysis considers the effect of the placement (azimuth and tilt) of fixed solar PV systems on their total energy production, peak power production, and economic value given local solar radiation, weather, and electricity market prices and rate structures. This analysis details a model that was used to

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The coincident peak demand impact of DPV in our study is less than the retail sales impacts on a percentage basis (e.g., 0.8% per year reduction in retail sales and 0.6% per year reduction in peak demand in the 8% DPV deployment case) because the timing of maximum PV output does not coincide perfectly with the utility's annual peak demand. This is particularly the case for Public Service of Colorado that serves load near the Rocky Mountains, which results in lower DPV production in afternoon hours relative to other geographic locations due to the effect of mountain shadows [50]. We consider lower and higher contribution of DPV savings to peak in the DPV value sensitivities.…”
Section: Dpv Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coincident peak demand impact of DPV in our study is less than the retail sales impacts on a percentage basis (e.g., 0.8% per year reduction in retail sales and 0.6% per year reduction in peak demand in the 8% DPV deployment case) because the timing of maximum PV output does not coincide perfectly with the utility's annual peak demand. This is particularly the case for Public Service of Colorado that serves load near the Rocky Mountains, which results in lower DPV production in afternoon hours relative to other geographic locations due to the effect of mountain shadows [50]. We consider lower and higher contribution of DPV savings to peak in the DPV value sensitivities.…”
Section: Dpv Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fixed PV panel grid connected has to be mounted at the optimum annual tilt angle, because the yearly energy must be maximized. Rhodes et al et al calculated for Austin, USA, the optimal annual tilt angle and the azimuth angle, which are 28°and 188°, respectively [92].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paper [11] considers the effect of azimuth and tilt of fixed solar PV systems considering total energy, economics, and peak power implications. The results challenge the default placement ruleof thumb.…”
Section: Of 17mentioning
confidence: 99%