2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.cor.2018.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective differential evolution algorithm for parallel batch processing machine scheduling considering electricity consumption cost

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the current solution, the third neighborhood structures S 3 is used to search for better solutions than the current solution, and it means that the solutions found can dominate the current solution. 13.…”
Section: Variable Neighborhood Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on the current solution, the third neighborhood structures S 3 is used to search for better solutions than the current solution, and it means that the solutions found can dominate the current solution. 13.…”
Section: Variable Neighborhood Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have carried out a lot of research on energy-efficiency scheduling under TOU electricity tariffs in different generic manufacturing systems. Simple manufacturing systems, such as single machine and parallel machine, have been studied by many researchers [10][11][12][13]. However, there are few reports on complex manufacturing systems, such as flow shop, flexible flow shop, job shop, flexible job shop, etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeled by a mixed integer programming Solved by heuristic algorithms, including four single-sequence based heuristics, a biased random-key genetic algorithm, and a hybrid bin loading algorithm Liao and Liao [7] Scheduling jobs in a flow shop with two batch processing machines Formulated as Improved Mixed Integer Linear (MILP) Programming models The solution was proposed as a MILP-based heuristic algorithm Lu et al [8] Scheduling of a multiproduct multi-stage batch processing system Modeled as a mixed integer linear programming (MILP) problem The model was divided into several sub-problems as the horizon was rolled forward, of which a fixand-relax strategy was applied Muthuswamy et al [9] Makespan minimization in a two-machine no-wait flow shop with batch processing machines A particle swarm optimization algorithm was proposed Sabzehparvar and Seyed-Hosseini [10] Multi-mode resource constrained project scheduling problem with mode dependent time lags Solved by Floyd-Warshall algorithm Tang and Liu [11] Two-machine flow shop scheduling involving a batching machine with transportation or deterioration consideration Solved by a heuristic algorithm and its worst-case performance was discussed Traumann and Schwindt [12] Scheduling a given set of operations in a multipurpose batch plant Modeled by a novel two-phase approach (algorithm) dealing with two types of constraints separately H. Zhou et al [13] Batch-processing machine scheduling with arbitrary release times and non-identical job sizes A particle swarm optimization algorithm was modified and applied S. Zhou et al [14] Parallel batch processing machine scheduling considering electricity consumption cost A multi-objective differential evolution algorithm was proposed imi : Amount of time needed to process the activity (batch) in execution mode m i (processing unit m i ) in scenario s. r s i1mi : Amount of time needed from machine #1 as a resource to process the activity (batch) in execution mode m i (processing unit m i ) in scenario s. r s i2mi : Amount of time needed from machine #2 as a resource to process the activity (batch) in execution mode m i (processing unit m i ) in scenario s.…”
Section: Mathematical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Giglio et al [45] solved an integrated lot sizing and energy-efficient job shop scheduling problem using a relax-and-fix heuristic algorithm; they show that their method can reduce energy consumption, machines idle times, and the overall cost of the system. Some researchers also considered the optimal scheduling method with time-sharing prices [46,47]; however, that belongs to another topic where only the time period with low electric charge is considered, and this goes out of the scope of this research. For the IPPS problem, owing to complexity in the integration of process planning and scheduling, studies on the IPPS problem with energy-saving criteria appear to be limited according to existing publications.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%