2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15387-7_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Objective Evolutionary Approach for the Antenna Positioning Problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking now the parameter ˛, some researchers such as Segura [19] stated that a decision maker must select its value. The latter is tuned considering the importance given to the coverage in relation with the number of deployed BTSs.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taking now the parameter ˛, some researchers such as Segura [19] stated that a decision maker must select its value. The latter is tuned considering the importance given to the coverage in relation with the number of deployed BTSs.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [88,90] used several evolutionary and nonevolutionary algorithms for benchmarking several solvers of the APP. Several multiobjective algorithms such as the Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II), the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm 2 (SPEA2) and the adaptive and non-adaptive Indicator-Based Evolutionary Algorithm (IBEA) were also used in [19] to tackle a multiobjective formulation of the APP. Then, a parallel hyper-heuristic was devised in [20] for the antenna positioning problem.…”
Section: Antenna Positioning Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As far as the parameter σ is concerned, some researchers such as Segura [17], stated that a decision maker must select its value. It is tuned with respect to the importance given to coverage and the relation with the number of deployed BTSs.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [76] and [78] used several evolutionary and non-evolutionary algorithms for benchmarking several solvers of the APP. Several multiobjective algorithms such as the non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II, the strength pareto evolutionary algorithm 2 and the adaptive and non-adaptive indicator-based evolutionary algorithm were also used in [17] to tackle a multiobjective formulation of the APP. Then, a parallel hyper-heuristic was devised in [18] for the APP.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since their inception, a broad array of algorithms and applications has been developed and refined to tackle the challenge of antenna positioning. Notable advancements include the development of the greedy algorithm [12] and the implementation of sophisticated distributed genetic algorithms [13], evolving towards more complex multiobjective approaches [14]. Furthermore, innovative variants of genetic algorithms inspired by quantum mechanics (QIGA) have been explored, proving their validity through real case studies and detailed statistical analysis [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%