Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation 2005
DOI: 10.1145/1068009.1068140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective genetic algorithm for robust design optimization

Abstract: Real-world multi-objective engineering design optimization problems often have parameters with uncontrollable variations. The aim of solving such problems is to obtain solutions that in terms of objectives and feasibility are as good as possible and at the same time are least sensitive to the parameter variations. Such solutions are said to be robust optimum solutions. In order to investigate the trade-off between the performance and robustness of optimum solutions, we present a new Robust Multi-Objective Gene… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In such situations, DMs prefer solutions that are robust against small changes in decision variables [156][157][158]. There have been some discussions on robust multi-objective optimization [159][160][161][162][163][164], but little research has studied the robustness in decision making, except for measuring attractiveness by a categorical based evaluation technique (MAC-BETH) [165]. The analysis of the mapping relationship from decision variables to objectives [166] helps searching robust solutions in the preference-based methods.…”
Section: Functional Maps From Decision Variables To Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such situations, DMs prefer solutions that are robust against small changes in decision variables [156][157][158]. There have been some discussions on robust multi-objective optimization [159][160][161][162][163][164], but little research has studied the robustness in decision making, except for measuring attractiveness by a categorical based evaluation technique (MAC-BETH) [165]. The analysis of the mapping relationship from decision variables to objectives [166] helps searching robust solutions in the preference-based methods.…”
Section: Functional Maps From Decision Variables To Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applications and studies of robust optimisation can be widely found in other non software engineering research literature [39], [40] but are seldom found in the requirements engineering research. In requirements engineering, to the best of our knowledge, there are only three studies applying robust optimisation on requirements optimisation area.…”
Section: B Uncertainty Handling In Requirements Selection and Optimimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other definitions of robustness include: consistency of results between different runs [26], and reliability of results in uncertain environments, where the fitness function optimum is time varying [8]. Jin and Mian [14,18] improve the robustness of a single objective optimization problem by treating it as a multiobjective problem where robustness is an extra objective.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%