2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-018-3636-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective location and channel model for ULS network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this section, we compare the method introduced in this paper with the multi-objective location and channel model for the ULS network proposed by Hejun et al [ 46 ]. Both approaches plan logistics networks based on actual data such as geographical location, population density, and freight traffic conditions, and both achieved desirable outcomes in alleviating traffic congestion and reducing logistics costs during a logistics network simulation in Nanjing’s Xianlin district.…”
Section: Example and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, we compare the method introduced in this paper with the multi-objective location and channel model for the ULS network proposed by Hejun et al [ 46 ]. Both approaches plan logistics networks based on actual data such as geographical location, population density, and freight traffic conditions, and both achieved desirable outcomes in alleviating traffic congestion and reducing logistics costs during a logistics network simulation in Nanjing’s Xianlin district.…”
Section: Example and Results Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, research on the planning of underground logistics networks is focused on layout and path planning, aiming at the minimum total cost. For example, a hybrid planning model was proposed to distribute freight between an underground network and maritime highways to obtain a layout plan for an underground logistics network with the goal of cost-minimizing [10,17,18]. In addition, some researchers have developed a weighted set coverage model for node positioning in underground logistics networks aiming at the lowest total cost [19], while others have developed a planning method based on the subway system [11].…”
Section: Underground Logistics Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e optimal ULS nodes, tunnel layout, and transport route network flows were formulated via a biobjective mixedinteger linear programming model considering minimal costs and maximal system utilization [9]. Liang et al [10] established a multiobject ULS network planning model, including hub location and tunnel linking, and used agglomerative hierarchical clustering to determine the location of the first-level hubs and a greedy algorithm (GA) to determine the locations of the second-level hubs covered by each first-level hub. Ren et al [11] constructed a set-covering problem (SCP) model to determine the locations of the firstlevel hubs, and their results were optimized according to freight volume and the cargo handling capacity of the hubs.…”
Section: Logistics Location For Uls Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the location of the hubs affects the number of underground nodes and the total length of the tunnels, and underground engineering is extremely expensive. Determining the logistics location for a ULS is a complicated and systematic task for which optimization algorithms have been designed considering various parameters, such as costs, distances, regional congestion, and freight volumes [9][10][11][12]. However, the current location approaches assume that important parameters, such as regional congestion and freight volumes, are known parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%