2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.06.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective programming method for solving network DEA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the proposed method, the divisional e ciencies (within an organization) and the overall e ciency of the organization were formulated as separate objective functions in the multiobjective programming model [24]. Despotis et al also used multi-objective programming approach for solving a network DEA problem [25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the proposed method, the divisional e ciencies (within an organization) and the overall e ciency of the organization were formulated as separate objective functions in the multiobjective programming model [24]. Despotis et al also used multi-objective programming approach for solving a network DEA problem [25].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are different methods to solve the two objective model 9. In this study Fuzzy method [10] is applied. General algorithm of this method is presented in section 5.…”
Section: Two-stage Dea Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where: To solve the above model (Model 10) through fuzzy method [10], the following operation was performed:…”
Section: K-stage Model Ndea-ccr In the Presence Of Semi-positive And mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature of supply chain network design problems, to make the models more realistic, several objectives are considered together (Murillo-Alvarado et al 2015;Pasandideha et al 2015;Godichaud and Amodeo 2015;Gholamian et al 2015). Besides, the solution of multi-objective problems is both attractive and challenging (Kao et al 2014;Jadidia et al 2015;Ghodratnama et al 2015;Validi et al 2014).…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%