2018
DOI: 10.1108/ec-09-2016-0320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-objective robust optimization approach for engineering design under interval uncertainty

Abstract: Purpose Engineering system design and optimization problems are usually multi-objective and constrained and have uncertainties in the inputs. These uncertainties might significantly degrade the overall performance of engineering systems and change the feasibility of the obtained solutions. This paper aims to propose a multi-objective robust optimization approach based on Kriging metamodel (K-MORO) to obtain the robust Pareto set under the interval uncertainty. Design/methodology/approach In K-MORO, the neste… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Eyvindson and Kangas, 2016) and robust optimization (Knoke et al, 2020). For instance, constructing Pareto frontiers based on robust solutions (Zhou et al, 2018) could guarantee bidders minimum provision levels. We expect risk integration to represent an important step in the mainstreaming of ES auctions.…”
Section: Synthesis: Key Opportunities and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eyvindson and Kangas, 2016) and robust optimization (Knoke et al, 2020). For instance, constructing Pareto frontiers based on robust solutions (Zhou et al, 2018) could guarantee bidders minimum provision levels. We expect risk integration to represent an important step in the mainstreaming of ES auctions.…”
Section: Synthesis: Key Opportunities and Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 According to Korolev and Toropov, 4 the first category is more expensive since it propagates uncertainty using HFMs. Zhou et al 15 developed a strategy for multi-objective RO based on Kriging. They proposed a criterion to determine whether the robustness must be evaluated based on the meta-model or on the robustness analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%