2023
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-2023-173
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-Parameter Dynamical Diagnostics for Upper Tropospheric and Lower Stratospheric Studies

Abstract: Abstract. Ozone trend estimates have shown large uncertainties in the upper troposphere/lower stratosphere (UTLS) region despite multi-decadal observations available from ground-based, balloon, aircraft, and satellite platforms. These uncertainties arise from large natural variability driven by dynamics (reflected in tropopause and jet variations) as well as the strength in constituent transport and mixing. Additionally, despite all the community efforts there is still a lack of representative high-quality glo… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 120 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, with the additional ozonesonde measurements after the 1990s, the Rs in the upper region is located, and are due to the large vertical gradients of ozone concentrations in the UTLS and the variability of the tropopause (Millan et al, 2023). The surface (boundary layer) ozone, however, shows a positive bias of the median, in all decades, of up to 12%, suggesting that TOST, which neglects ozone chemistry and deposition, often overestimates ozone concentration there.…”
Section: Validations With Ozonesonde Observationsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Similarly, with the additional ozonesonde measurements after the 1990s, the Rs in the upper region is located, and are due to the large vertical gradients of ozone concentrations in the UTLS and the variability of the tropopause (Millan et al, 2023). The surface (boundary layer) ozone, however, shows a positive bias of the median, in all decades, of up to 12%, suggesting that TOST, which neglects ozone chemistry and deposition, often overestimates ozone concentration there.…”
Section: Validations With Ozonesonde Observationsmentioning
confidence: 82%