2018
DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae932
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-scale computational approach based on TMS experiments for the assessment of electro-stimulation thresholds of the brain at intermediate frequencies

Abstract: In recent years, human exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) at intermediate frequencies (300 Hz–10 MHz) has risen, mainly due to the growth of technologies using these fields. The current safety guidelines/standards defined by international bodies (e.g. ICNIRP and IEEE) established basic restrictions for limiting EMF exposure. These limits at intermediate frequencies are derived from threshold values of the internal electric field that may produce transient effects, such as the stimulation of the nervous s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study of dose to brain tissue from transcranial magnetic stimulation reported good agreement between the median in situ electric fields and corresponding 95% confidence intervals for both the 2-mm cubic and 5-mm linear averages of in situ electric fields [43]. The study in this paper reports a similar tendency (Table 3) for the ≤ 99.99 th percentile of inner tissues, with relatively large differences for maximum values (100 th percentile).…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…A previous study of dose to brain tissue from transcranial magnetic stimulation reported good agreement between the median in situ electric fields and corresponding 95% confidence intervals for both the 2-mm cubic and 5-mm linear averages of in situ electric fields [43]. The study in this paper reports a similar tendency (Table 3) for the ≤ 99.99 th percentile of inner tissues, with relatively large differences for maximum values (100 th percentile).…”
Section: Discussion and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The derived reference level in Fig. 4 showed that allowable external magnetic field strength and in-situ EF established by both guidelines/standards are significantly lower than the internal EF needed for the stimulation of the central nervous system for medical applications [16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Technical Committee 95., Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. and IEEE-SA Standards Board., no date; ICNIRP, 2010), as shown by (Soldati et al, 2018;Gomez-Tames et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%