Biology is reaching a convergence point of its historic reductionist and modern holistic approaches to understanding the living system. Structural biology has historically taken the reductionist approach to deeply probe the inner workings of complex molecular machines. In contrast, systems biology and genome-scale modeling have organically grown out of the wealth of data now being generated by diverse omics measurements. In the late 2000s, a proposed interdisciplinary field of structural systems biology pitched the merger of these two approaches, with widespread applications in pharmacology, disease modeling, protein engineering, and evolutionary studies. In this commentary, we highlight the challenges of integrating these two fields, with a focus on genome-scale metabolic modeling, and the novel findings that are made possible from such a merger.A challenge for converging fields T he field of structural systems biology represents an integration of two established, but quite different, fields: structural biology and systems biology. Given the different histories, underlying paradigms, ways of thinking, and the characteristics of the data types used in these two fields, such an integration is not without its challenges. In spite of these fundamental differences, a convergence is not only happening, but is necessary to achieve the ultimate goals of systems biology.The number of experimental structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) continues to steadily rise each year. A key distinction between structural data and the omics data types prevalent in systems biology is the capability of structural data to "zoom in" to the atomic level to study fundamental details of chemical interactions. A structural biologist knows the value of mechanistic insights that can be gained from this information. Structural data offer new features, such as a threedimensional context to mutations, post-translational modifications, protein domains, linking needs for functionalizing prosthetic groups to metabolism, ROS damage sites, and others, enabling the execution of novel studies in systems biology. We have now reached the point where structural information for certain organisms, such as Escherichia coli and Homo sapiens, can be utilized at the systems level.In contrast to structural biology, a systems biologist "zooms out" to see thousands of biomolecular interactions happening simultaneously. The totality of such interactions is experimentally studied through the generation of various omics data types and by constructing large-scale mechanistic frameworks to relate individual components represented in such data sets. The success of genome-scale metabolic modeling can be attributed to high-quality, bottom-up reconstructions of metabolic, protein synthesis, and transcriptional regulatory networks on an organism-specific basis.