2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2018.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-screening Fast qPCR approach to the identification of abortive agents in ruminants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-infectious abortions are mostly sporadic and occur at any pregnancy stage, but causes are difficult to diagnose and in most cases remain unknown [ 43 , 44 ]. Nevertheless, available evidence indicates that different bacteria, viruses and protozoa are by far the most plausible causative agents of abortions in sheep and goats [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Non-infectious abortions are mostly sporadic and occur at any pregnancy stage, but causes are difficult to diagnose and in most cases remain unknown [ 43 , 44 ]. Nevertheless, available evidence indicates that different bacteria, viruses and protozoa are by far the most plausible causative agents of abortions in sheep and goats [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While infectious causes are regarded as predominant in ruminant abortions ( 38 ), environmental factors are known risk factors ( 19 ), as are management systems and husbandry factors ( 39 ). As husbandry systems vary across agroecological zones ( 40 ) disease prevalence varies widely across agroecological zone, as shown by Welay et al ( 41 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 60 ], Anaplasma sp. [ 61 ], and adenovirus [ 62 ], whereas qPCRs were performed to investigate Coxiella burnetii [ 63 ] and Borrelia burgdoferi sensu latu [ 64 ]. Samples which tested positive for B. burgdoferi sensu latu were confirmed through end-point PCR tests [ 65 ] and then subjected to Sanger sequencing for species identification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%