2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10532-022-09988-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-step nitrifying microbial enrichment to remove ammonia and nitrite in brackish aquaculture systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, three kinds of low molecular and commonly used organic carbon sources, including sodium acetate, sodium citrate, and sucrose, were added into the enrichment medium for the enhancement of the enrichment process [27,38]. Good results were achieved in the enrichment period and biomass production compared to previous similar studies [16,24,25,37]. The enrichment process of nitrifying bioflocs was clearly shown by the concentration changes of NH 4 + -N, NO 2 − -N, NO 3 − -N, TIN, and input TN in the reactors with different organic carbon additions (Figure 1).…”
Section: Enrichment Process Of Nitrifying Bioflocs and The Effects Of...mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, three kinds of low molecular and commonly used organic carbon sources, including sodium acetate, sodium citrate, and sucrose, were added into the enrichment medium for the enhancement of the enrichment process [27,38]. Good results were achieved in the enrichment period and biomass production compared to previous similar studies [16,24,25,37]. The enrichment process of nitrifying bioflocs was clearly shown by the concentration changes of NH 4 + -N, NO 2 − -N, NO 3 − -N, TIN, and input TN in the reactors with different organic carbon additions (Figure 1).…”
Section: Enrichment Process Of Nitrifying Bioflocs and The Effects Of...mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this study, a mixotrophic medium was designed and used, which was modified from the combination of autotrophic medium and artificial feed. Autotrophic medium had both NH 4 + -N and NO 2 − -N substrates for the concomitant growth of ammoniaand nitrite-oxidizing bacteria [36,37]. Artificial feed provided organic nitrogen and carbon sources for bacterial growth and, meanwhile, simulated the feeding environment of aquaculture systems.…”
Section: Enrichment Process Of Nitrifying Bioflocs and The Effects Of...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N by the nitrifying bacteria in this water remediation experiment(Wang et al, 2020; Alarcón-Vivero et al, 2022;Tuyet et al, 2022). In the AA, the NO 2 -N concentrations were decreased rapidly and e ciently for the oxidative capacities of the free oxygen (DO) in the waters to nitrify the N(+ III) into N(+ V) under the conditions of the high concentration of DO (5.0 ± 0.6 mg/L) to increase the redox potential (ORP) about + 213 ± 37 mV, where the nal concentrations were all much lower than the ones of the anticipation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In the AA, the NO 2 -N concentrations were decreased rapidly and e ciently for the oxidative capacities of the free oxygen (DO) in the waters to nitrify the N(+ III) into N(+ V) under the conditions of the high concentration of DO (5.0 ± 0.6 mg/L) to increase the redox potential (ORP) about + 213 ± 37 mV, where the nal concentrations were all much lower than the ones of the anticipation. Although the DO concentrations were about maintained at 4.5 ± 0.6 mg/L in the IGR and 4.1 ± 0.3 mg/L in the SA which were much higher than the desired value of 2.0 mg/L of the nitri cation reaction demand, the quantities of the NO 2 -N amounts were oxidated by DO (O 2 ) to form the c compounds in the AA aeras, the left ones might not be well combined with O-atom in the SA and the IGR because of the low concentrations to delay and balance the nitri cation reaction with the lower chances to the probably collides until their coalescences(Qian et al, 2022;Tuyet et al, 2022). It was the reason that the decrease e ciencies of the NO 2 -N contaminants got less re ecting that the NO 2 -N contaminants respectively were of 0.14 ± 0.01 mg/L in the IGR and 0.11 ± 0.01 mg/L in the SA of Fig.3A, 0.23 ± 0.03 mg/L in the IGR and 0.16 ± 0.02 mg/L in the SA of Fig.3Band 0.23 ± 0.02 mg/L in the IGR and 0.16 ± 0.01 mg/L in the SA of Fig.3C.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%