2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2004.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-task automatic generation control for power regulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to overcome the drawbacks of the ASL local controllers proposed in [18], the dynamic model of ASL loads is first introduced in this paper based on the field experiment data. We also improve the dynamic model proposed in [19] to consider demand-side participation by aluminum smelter loads. The improved dynamic model is suitable for frequency control study in the isolated system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to overcome the drawbacks of the ASL local controllers proposed in [18], the dynamic model of ASL loads is first introduced in this paper based on the field experiment data. We also improve the dynamic model proposed in [19] to consider demand-side participation by aluminum smelter loads. The improved dynamic model is suitable for frequency control study in the isolated system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The incremental angle of the first generator is treated as the reference angle. Therefore, we can get the following equation by deleting the variable and the column in corresponding to generator 1 [19]:…”
Section: State Space Model Of the Isolated System With Demand-sidementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since identification procedure presented in [41] can only be used for CAs that have only one power plant engaged in LFC, it AUTOMATIKA 51(2010) 1, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] can not be used here because LFC in CA1 from Fig. 2 is conducted using three HPPs.…”
Section: Substitute Linear Power System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, many different nonlinearities are present in the model. Nowadays, proportional-integral (PI) algorithms with constant parameters are mostly used in real power systems [14][15][16][17]. The reasons to replace them with some advanced control algorithm are the following: 1) systems with PI control have long settling time and relatively large overshoots in frequency's transient responses [18]; 2) PI control algorithm provides required behavior only in the vicinity of the nominal operating point for which it is designed; 3) future power systems will rely on large amounts of distributed generation with large percentage of renewable energy based sources and that will further increase system uncertainties [19]; 4) the shortening of time periods in which each level of frequency regulation must be finished is also expected in the future [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%