Oceans 2019 MTS/Ieee Seattle 2019
DOI: 10.23919/oceans40490.2019.8962711
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multi-use and multi-stakeholder ocean observing platform system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To achieve this goal, baseline surveys and continuous monitoring of natural ecosystems are urgently needed, as proposed by the ‘Southern Ocean Observing System’ (SOOS, 2017) and by the ‘Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research’ (SCAR, 2021) and discussed in the ‘ANtarctic Terrestrial and Near‐shore Observing System’ report (ANTOS, 2015). Similar monitoring actions are also urged by the most important networks of marine observing systems, such as, for example, the ‘Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatory’ (JERICO), the ‘European Multidisciplinary Seafloor and water column Observatory’ (EMSO) and ‘Ocean Network Canada’ (ONC; Dañobeitia et al, 2020; Moran et al, 2019; Painting et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…To achieve this goal, baseline surveys and continuous monitoring of natural ecosystems are urgently needed, as proposed by the ‘Southern Ocean Observing System’ (SOOS, 2017) and by the ‘Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research’ (SCAR, 2021) and discussed in the ‘ANtarctic Terrestrial and Near‐shore Observing System’ report (ANTOS, 2015). Similar monitoring actions are also urged by the most important networks of marine observing systems, such as, for example, the ‘Joint European Research Infrastructure network for Coastal Observatory’ (JERICO), the ‘European Multidisciplinary Seafloor and water column Observatory’ (EMSO) and ‘Ocean Network Canada’ (ONC; Dañobeitia et al, 2020; Moran et al, 2019; Painting et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…In Atlantic Canada, only five case studies were found in the literature, making this region the one with the fewest collaborations compared with the Arctic and Pacific Canada. Further, in the report of Moran et al (2022), there is only one community monitoring platform directly collaborating with Indigenous groups on the East Coast, located in Placentia Bay, Newfoundland. Yet, Eger et al (2021) show increasing opportunities for integrated marine management with Indigenous groups in the Bay of Fundy area.…”
Section: Canadian Atlanticmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With an elevated emphasis from research and government institutions on meaningfully engaging with First Nations, new collaborations could improve traditional knowledge exchange to enhance marine carbon cycle understanding. The community-specific approach would follow successes in mapping (Davies et al 2020;Bishop et al 2022), coastal management (Weiss et al 2013;Lombard et al 2019), marine conservation (Ban et al 2009), observational oceanography (Moran et al 2022), and fisheries (Weatherdon et al 2016;Turgeon et al 2018;Reid et al 2021). As ocean CDR and Indigenous involvement in the sector are both just emerging, any new collaborative initiative should follow recommendations made by Breckwoldt et al (2021), including (1) the need for participation beyond data collection, (2) acknowledgment and mitigation of an agenda mismatch between funded and needed research, and (3) emphasizing the power of the transdisciplinary processes of learning together.…”
Section: Arctic Oceanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DONET was specifically designed as a seismic geohazard early-warning system (Kasaya et al, 2009), whereas EMSO, ONC, and OOI were designed for multidisciplinary monitoring and research in the fields of geology, physical oceanography, and ecology (e.g. Barnes and The NEPTUNE Canada Team, 2007;Service, 2007;Taylor, 2009;Ruhl et al, 2011;Aguzzi et al, 2012;Witze, 2013;Moran et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the cost to operate ONC's observatories since the deployment of its first seafloor monitoring assets in 2003 has been in excess of 114 M CA$ (https://www.oceannetworks.ca/about-us/ funders-partners/funders). Such seemingly high operational costs are justified by the multi-use and multi-stakeholder nature of ocean observatories, providing curated data and services to scientists, government agencies, policy-makers, and society as a whole (Moran et al, 2019). In this context, ocean cabled observatories should also align their strategic planning with the Sustainable Development Goals set by the United Nations (European Multidisciplinary Seafloor and water column Observatory, 2020), which call for the monitoring of essential ecosystem services, which include healthy fish stocks and sustainable fisheries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%