2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11207-011-9859-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multi-wavelength Analysis of Active Regions and Sunspots by Comparison of Automatic Detection Algorithms

Abstract: The algorithms involved in this study are as follows:1. The Solar Monitor Active Region Tracker (SMART) extracts, characterises, and tracks the evolution of active regions across the solar disk using line-of-sight magnetograms and a combination of image processing techniques. 2. The Automated Solar Activity Prediction code (ASAP) converts continuum images from heliocentric coordinates to Carrington heliographic coordinates, detects and tracks sunspots using thresholding and morphological methods. 3. The Sunspo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Martens et al (2012) produced software modules that detect, trace, and analyze the emergence and evolution of ARs, magnetic elements and other solar features, such as flares, sigmoids, filaments, coronal dimmings, polarity inversion lines, sunspots and other magnetic structures. Verbeeck et al (2013) described two algorithms: the solar monitor active region tracker (SMART), which automatically extracts, characterizes, and tracks active regions (Higgins et al 2011); and the automated solar activity prediction (ASAP), which represents a set of algorithms that detect sunspots, faculae, and active regions (Colak & Qahwaji 2008). Moreover, Verbeeck et al (2014) described another method called the spatial possibility clustering algorithm (SPoCA-suite).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martens et al (2012) produced software modules that detect, trace, and analyze the emergence and evolution of ARs, magnetic elements and other solar features, such as flares, sigmoids, filaments, coronal dimmings, polarity inversion lines, sunspots and other magnetic structures. Verbeeck et al (2013) described two algorithms: the solar monitor active region tracker (SMART), which automatically extracts, characterizes, and tracks active regions (Higgins et al 2011); and the automated solar activity prediction (ASAP), which represents a set of algorithms that detect sunspots, faculae, and active regions (Colak & Qahwaji 2008). Moreover, Verbeeck et al (2014) described another method called the spatial possibility clustering algorithm (SPoCA-suite).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Verbeeck et al (2011) provide a detailed comparison of outputs from four automatic detection algorithms that detect sunspots, magnetic, and coronal ARs using six weeks of SOHO-EIT data. At the chromospheric level, network and plage regions are separated using thresholding methods (Steinegger et al 1998;Worden et al 1999), which are possibly combined with region-growing techniques (Benkhalil et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prediction performance is assessed using standard forecast-verification measures and compared with the prediction measures of ASAP (Ahmed et al 2013). d ASAP's team at University of Bradford carried out joint research with Royal Observatory of Belgium (ROB), Glasgow University, and Trinity College Dublin (Verbeeck et al 2013). The aim of this work was to compare the performance of established solar imaging systems (ASAP, Spatial Possibilistic Clustering Algorithm (SPoCA), Sunspot Tracking and Recognition Algorithm, and SMART) when processing SDO data.…”
Section: Operational Modeling For Nowcasting and Forecasting Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%