2011
DOI: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicenter prospective phase II randomized trial of epirubicin/vinorelbine versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/vinorelbine as first-line treatment in advanced breast cancer. A GOIM study

Abstract: BackgroundTo evaluate activity and tolerability of two anthracycline-containing regimens as first-line treatment for anthracycline-naïve relapsed breast cancer patients.MethodsPatients with relapsed breast cancer not previously treated with adjuvant anthracyclines were randomly assigned to epirubicin/vinorelbine (arm A: EPI/VNB, EPI 90 mg/m2 on day 1, VNB 25 mg/m2 on days 1,5 plus G-CSF subcutaneously on days 7-12, with cycles repeated every 21 days), or to pegylated liposomal doxorubicin/VNB (arm B: PLD/VNB, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The changes in the blood cells especially erythrocytes, platelets, and leucocyte count were all DOX dose dependent and were consistent with the findings reported by Manno et al [ 5 ]; Tacar et al [ 51 ], which could be attributed to the known bone marrow suppressive effect of DOX and iron-DOX interaction, thus causing RBC membrane rupture as previously reported by Vici et al [ 52 ] and Pahouja et al [ 53 ] since DOX did not limit its effects not only to cancer cell alone but also to proliferating haematopoietic cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The changes in the blood cells especially erythrocytes, platelets, and leucocyte count were all DOX dose dependent and were consistent with the findings reported by Manno et al [ 5 ]; Tacar et al [ 51 ], which could be attributed to the known bone marrow suppressive effect of DOX and iron-DOX interaction, thus causing RBC membrane rupture as previously reported by Vici et al [ 52 ] and Pahouja et al [ 53 ] since DOX did not limit its effects not only to cancer cell alone but also to proliferating haematopoietic cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In the current scenario, our reporting is of limited meaning and mainly confined to the particularly high rate of pCR and lack of development of significant cardiotoxicity. In an optimistic view, we may at least partly explain the efficacy rates by the use of epirubicin at a dose of 120 mg/m 2 per cycle instead than the canonical dose of 90 mg/m 2 , since a dose‐response effect has been more clearly demonstrated with epirubin than doxorubicin (Vici et al, ). In addition, the choice of a less cardiotoxic anthracycline‐analog such as epirubicin may have conditioned the lack of development of any significant cardiotoxicity, along with the cumulative epirubicin dose not exceeding 480 mg/m 2 , the strict criteria applied for patient selection, the low median age, and the absence of any previous treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our study, doxorubicin administration resulted in anemia, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia due to the suppressive effects of doxorubicin on the bone marrow, with only partial reversibility in the high‐dose animals. Hematologic toxicity as a result of bone marrow suppression is a well‐known side effect of doxorubicin treatment and has been reported in humans (Vici et al ., ) as well as in animal models (Desai et al ., ). Such changes manifest as a decline in the red blood cell lineage, including a decreased red blood cell count, hematocrit and hemoglobin levels (Bertazzoli et al ., , Herman et al ., , Molyneux et al ., , Panis et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%