2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicenter randomized controlled trial of cyanoacrylate closure and surgical stripping for incompetent great saphenous veins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Endovenous cyanoacrylate ablation was compared to surgical stripping in a randomized controlled trial with 63 patients in each group [5]. The 12-month closure rate was 100% in both groups, but the pain and bruising scores were significantly lower in the NBCA group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Endovenous cyanoacrylate ablation was compared to surgical stripping in a randomized controlled trial with 63 patients in each group [5]. The 12-month closure rate was 100% in both groups, but the pain and bruising scores were significantly lower in the NBCA group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have demonstrated the efficacy and safety of endovenous cyanoacrylate ablation for the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency. A randomized controlled trial of surgical stripping vs. endovenous cyanoacrylate ablation found 100% target vein closure at 3 months in both groups, with similar quality-of-life improvements but significantly less pain and bruising in the cyanoacrylate group [5]. Another randomized controlled trial compared endovenous cyanoacrylate ablation to radiofrequency ablation [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В сроки 3 мес. частота окклюзии составила 100%, но показатели послеоперационной боли и экхимозов были значимо ниже в группе ЦКО [28].…”
Section: цианоакрилатная клеевая облитерация в американских клиническ...unclassified
“…Our initial experience showed that this inflammatory reaction occurred in 1 of 21 patients (4.7%) who underwent CAC for bilateral GSV reflux [ 12 ]. The CASS trial comparing the clinical outcomes between the CAC and surgical stripping groups showed that 3 of 63 patients (4.8%) experienced this complication after the CAC procedure [ 10 ]. A lower incidence of phlebitis (3.2%) than that in our findings was reported by Tekin et al [ 13 ].…”
Section: Prevalencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This trial demonstrated that both CAC and surgical stripping achieved complete occlusion of the target vein (TV) at 3 months. Postoperative pain and ecchymosis grades were significantly lower in the CAC group than in the conventional surgical stripping group [ 10 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%