2013
DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mds494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicenter, randomized trial of flat dosing versus intrapatient dose escalation of single-agent carboplatin as first-line chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: an SGCTG (SCOTROC 4) and ANZGOG study on behalf of GCIG

Abstract: Intrapatient dose escalation of carboplatin based on nadir blood counts is feasible and safe. However, it provided no improvement in PFS or OS compared with flat dosing. Baseline neutrophils over-ride nadir counts in prognostic significance. These data may have wider implications particularly in respect of the management of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
44
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
44
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because an association between C-iN and improved PFS was not observed, post-progression therapy may have a greater, if as yet poorly understood, impact among neutropenic patients, but this is just conjecture. Nevertheless, these results are consistent with the observations reported by others who have noted that C-iN is positively correlated with patient outcomes in a variety of solid tumors including non-small cell lung, colorectal, gastric, breast, cervical, and ovarian cancer [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Shitara et al conducted a meta-analysis comprised of 9528 patients from 13 prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated neutropenia or leucopenia as a prognostic factor for survival [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Because an association between C-iN and improved PFS was not observed, post-progression therapy may have a greater, if as yet poorly understood, impact among neutropenic patients, but this is just conjecture. Nevertheless, these results are consistent with the observations reported by others who have noted that C-iN is positively correlated with patient outcomes in a variety of solid tumors including non-small cell lung, colorectal, gastric, breast, cervical, and ovarian cancer [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Shitara et al conducted a meta-analysis comprised of 9528 patients from 13 prospective and retrospective studies that evaluated neutropenia or leucopenia as a prognostic factor for survival [21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…There were no statistically significant differences in median PFS or median OS. In univariate analysis, C-iN was associated with improved PFS [20]. High baseline neutrophils (and other hematological parameters including the difference between baseline white blood cell count and neutrophils) were associated with reduced PFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In adults, perhaps the most common method is that of Calvert which describes the relationship between dose and AUC [12]. There is no evidence that increasing the AUC to above a level of 5 (using EDTA GFR estimates) or 6 (using Cockcroft-Gault calculated GFR) in ovary cancer patients results in any better responses or overall survival [13]. Having established reasonable safety with routine doses of platinum therapy, we do not 'routinely' assess nadir blood counts in these patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%