2008
DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000325871.60129.23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multicenter Study of Factors Influencing Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunt Survival in Infants and Children

Abstract: Regional variation in the risk of ventricular shunt revision exists, and young infants are at the highest risk for shunt failure. Risk factors for the duration of shunt survival differ between the initial and subsequent revisions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
37
2
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
37
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing work demonstrates an overall 30-day shunt failure rate of approximately 13%; the current study expands on the existing work by analyzing patients undergoing an initial shunt placement separately from those undergoing a shunt revision, revealing a shunt failure rate of 8 and 14%, respectively [9,14]. Consistent with prior studies, patients undergoing a shunt revision were more likely to experience shunt failure than patients undergoing an initial VP shunt placement [9,14,15,16]. As the two groups are not directly comparable considering their significant preoperative differences, the present study also demonstrates that the factors predictive of shunt failure are different in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Existing work demonstrates an overall 30-day shunt failure rate of approximately 13%; the current study expands on the existing work by analyzing patients undergoing an initial shunt placement separately from those undergoing a shunt revision, revealing a shunt failure rate of 8 and 14%, respectively [9,14]. Consistent with prior studies, patients undergoing a shunt revision were more likely to experience shunt failure than patients undergoing an initial VP shunt placement [9,14,15,16]. As the two groups are not directly comparable considering their significant preoperative differences, the present study also demonstrates that the factors predictive of shunt failure are different in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Reinprecht et al [8] described an incidence of obstruction of 41% in the first year in a series of 42 preterm infants with posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus. Other studies have shown similar results, albeit most large series are not restricted to preterm-related posthaemorrhagic hydrocephalus [1,2,3,4,5,6,7]. The differences observed in our series may be due to the fact that no cases were classified as obstruction if either disconnection or infection of the shunt was present at the same time.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The overall incidence of shunt obstruction in patients with hydrocephalus is estimated to be around 40% during the first year and increases to affect nearly 50% of patients by the second year after shunt implantation [1,2]. Long-term follow-up data available from the Shunt Design Trial show that only 41% of shunts remain free of obstruction after 4 years of follow-up [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low age or prematurity have been found to be significant risk factors for shunt failure in previous studies, with HR in a narrow range of 2.02–2.49, compared to 2.05 in the present study (table 2) [4,5,13]. One previous study has found another concurrent procedure to be a risk factor with an HR of 1.77, similar to what we found (2.07), whereas McGirt et al [14], analysing 820 VPS procedures, found use of the endoscope to be a risk factor for shunt infection (RR = 1.58) [5,14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 40%
“…As a concurrent procedure prolongs the duration of surgery, the finding that long duration of surgery was found to be a risk factor for shunt failure (HR = 1.23 with every 30-min increase in time) may reflect this. Other risk factors previously studied include short time between revisions, aetiology of myelomeningocele and high number of previous shunts [5,13]. As we only studied first-time shunts, we have no data on risk factors involving revisions, as for aetiology as a risk factor, our population was too small to allow any conclusions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%