A multicentre analysis of the long-term outcomes of patients with localized rectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy alone due to medical inoperability or patient refusal

Abstract

3633 Background: The outcome for patients with localized rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy (CMT) or radiotherapy alone (RT) and no planned subsequent surgery is unknown. Insights can be provided by study of patients that do not undergo surgery due to excessive operative risk (medically inoperable) as a result of advanced age and/or co-morbidities, or patient refusal. Methods: A retrospective analysis at 6 Australian centers. Patients with recurrent rectal cancer, metastatic disease or primary tumors that were considered unresectable were excluded from the study. Results: We identified 48 patients treated between August 1998 and June 2005 meeting our criteria. There were 13 females and 35 males with a median age of 76 years (range 49 - 94). 24 patients (50%) were deemed medically inoperable and 24 patients refused surgery (the most common reasons were the desire to avoid a stoma or fear of surgery). Treatment was with standard long course radiation plus 5-FU (either bolus or continuous infusion) in 36 patients (75%) and 12 (25%) received RT alone. A complete clinical response was documented in 23 patients (48%) and a partial clinical response was documented in 14 patients (30%). At a median follow-up of 49 months, 18 patients (37.5%) have documented disease progression including 10 of 24 in the medically inoperable group and 8 of 24 in the refused surgery group. The median progression-free survival for all patients was 30+ months. 7 had local progression only, 7 had distant progression only and 4 patients had both local and distant progression. Of the 23 deceased patients, 16 (70%) died from progressive disease and 7 (30%) from non-cancer causes, including 4 from the refused surgery group. The median survival for all patients was 35 + months. Conclusions: In patients who are not suitable candidates for surgical resection due to advanced age and/or comorbidity CRT or RT alone is a safe alternative that results in significant progression-free and overall survival times, with many patients succumbing to co-morbidities rather than progressive disease. Many of these patients refusing surgery will have long periods of disease control after treatment with CRT or RT. No significant financial relationships to disclose.