2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tube.2011.01.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicentre evaluation of the accuracy and performance of IP-10 for the diagnosis of infection with M. tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

11
84
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
84
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Denmark and Italy 101 healthy students with no history of exposure to TB, or prior TB disease or treatment Similar negativity rate between IP-10 test (95%) and QFT-IT (99%) [53] Frahm et al…”
Section: Healthy Controlsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Denmark and Italy 101 healthy students with no history of exposure to TB, or prior TB disease or treatment Similar negativity rate between IP-10 test (95%) and QFT-IT (99%) [53] Frahm et al…”
Section: Healthy Controlsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In two studies from a lowprevalence settings (Denmark and Italy), out of 187 nonexposed healthy controls, only 2% were found to be IP-10 test positive (specificity 98%) and 0% were QFT-IT positive (specificity 100%) and there was no indication of cross-reactivity with BCG vaccination [52,53]. The third study, performed in India, included 100 controls and reported positive results in 52% by the IP-10 test and 48% by the QFT-IT, probably reflecting the high prevalence of latent TB infection [54].…”
Section: Healthy Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations