2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2008.07337.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multicentre randomised clinical endpoint study of parma 5 computer‐assisted oral anticoagulant dosage

Abstract: SummaryTo meet growing demand for oral anticoagulation worldwide there has been increased dependence on computer-assistance in dosage although the safety and effectiveness of any of the individual computer-assisted dosage programs has not previously been established. This randomised multicentre clinical end-point study assessed a new version of the parma 5 program. It compared parma 5 safety and effectiveness with manual dosage by experienced medical staff at 19 centres with a known interest in oral anticoagul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…17 International normalized ratio values were maintained in an intended range between 2.0 to 3.0, and time in therapeutic range was calculated to assess the quality of anticoagulation. 18 Exclusion criteria were prosthetic heart valves or the presence of any severe valvulopathies, severe cognitive impairment, chronic infections (human immunodeficiency virus infection, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus), or autoimmune systemic disease. Subjects were also excluded from the study if they had active cancer or liver insufficiency (eg, cirrhosis).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 International normalized ratio values were maintained in an intended range between 2.0 to 3.0, and time in therapeutic range was calculated to assess the quality of anticoagulation. 18 Exclusion criteria were prosthetic heart valves or the presence of any severe valvulopathies, severe cognitive impairment, chronic infections (human immunodeficiency virus infection, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus), or autoimmune systemic disease. Subjects were also excluded from the study if they had active cancer or liver insufficiency (eg, cirrhosis).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10] All participants used an automated method for PT determination with a range of locally used commercial thromboplastins. The ISIs of the local PT systems were determined by ISI calibrations according to the US Food and Drug Administration-approved method using 20 ECAA artificially depleted lyophilized abnormal plasmas and 7 lyophilized normal plasmas.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main aims of the present study were therefore to investigate the following: (1) the use of calibrant plasma sets varying in number (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10) to derive the PT/INR Line; (2) the use of different calibrant sets with varying INR values; (3) whether sets of calibrant plasmas specifically selected from clusters to provide a spread of INR values across and outside the therapeutic 2.0 to 4.5 interval gave better results than randomly selected plasmas regardless of their INR values; and (4) whether there was additional value from the inclusion of a normal plasma in the set.…”
Section: The Prothrombin Time/international Normalized Ratio (Pt/inr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…International normalized ratio values were maintained in an intended range of between 2.0 and 3.0, and the time in therapeutic range was calculated to assess the quality of anticoagulation. 8 Exclusion criteria were prosthetic heart valves or the presence of any severe valvulopathies, severe cognitive impairment, chronic infections (HIV infection, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus), or systemic autoimmune diseases. Subjects were also excluded from the study if they had active cancer or liver insuffi ciency (eg, cirrhosis).…”
Section: Study Design and Patient Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%