“…As summarized in Figure 5g, similar to the hydrated BMAFs, the balance between the Young's modulus and toughness of the dehydrated O-BMAFs was superior to previously-reported RSSF materials and composites (Table S6, Supporting Information). [49,[51][52][53] More interestingly, when the mechanical properties of the BMAFs were compared with those of other biological and engineered materials [50,54] (Figure 5h,i), it was found that the mechanical performance of BMAFs matched well with that of a series of soft tissues (e.g., skin, muscles, and cartilages) and biological materials (e.g., keratin, collagen, and actin). For example, the O-BMAFs exhibited comparable extensibility and modulus to those of skin, muscles, and eye crystalline lenses.…”