2018
DOI: 10.1111/ijsw.12316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multilevel analysis of perceived intergenerational mobility and welfare state preferences

Abstract: Previous scholarship suggests that the effect of perceived intergenerational mobility on attitudes related to social justice, inequality and redistribution is more salient than the effect of individuals' objective intergenerational mobility. However, virtually no studies have attempted to link individuals' perception of experiencing intergenerational mobility and their support for different welfare state programmes. In my study using nationally representative and comparative survey data for 33 Western European… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present study analyses data from the Life in Transition Survey (LITS) commissioned by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD, 2016) and conducted in 2016 in the following in 34 countries: Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Estonia, North Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Tajikistan, Turkey, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. LITS is widely used in comparative social research (Gugushvili, 2019, Gugushvili, 2016; Urbaeva, 2019). Respondents in LITS were selected randomly, using a two-stage sampling procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present study analyses data from the Life in Transition Survey (LITS) commissioned by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD, 2016) and conducted in 2016 in the following in 34 countries: Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Estonia, North Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Poland, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Tajikistan, Turkey, Ukraine, and Uzbekistan. LITS is widely used in comparative social research (Gugushvili, 2019, Gugushvili, 2016; Urbaeva, 2019). Respondents in LITS were selected randomly, using a two-stage sampling procedure.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gapminder is arguably the only comparative dataset which provides information on the level of economic development for most years of the 20th century for each country included in LITS. This allows me to derive information on the level of economic development for individuals who were born even before the Second World War (Jarosz and Gugushvili, 2019). To understand how change in economic performance between individuals' birth years and 2010 is associated with their perceptions of intergenerational mobility, I calculate the difference between these two measures (mean 9068, SD 8142).…”
Section: Contextual-level Explanatory Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relevance of understanding subjective perception of intergenerational mobility is important because it has been shown that this type of perception is associated with various attitudinal, behavioural, and health-related outcomes. Those who perceive being upwardly socially mobile support individual explanations of why some people are in need and larger income differences, and oppose certain welfare state programmes such as housing and old-age pensions (Gugushvili, 2016b(Gugushvili, , 2016a(Gugushvili, , 2019Guillaud, 2013). Perceived downward social mobility has also been linked to reduced defence of the societal system in which individuals reside (Day and Fiske, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After deletion of missing information and censoring individuals aged below 20 (those who had not yet achieved their full height), 17,331 men and 21,909 women were included in the analyses. The LITS has been used in comparative social and health research (Gugushvili, 2019;, but post-socialist countries have generally been under-represented in multi-country surveys (Slomczynski & Tomescu-Dubrow, 2006). Also, there are no other comprehensive accounts of the association between parental socioeconomic characteristics and children's anthropometric dimensions in the majority of the analysed countries.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%