2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multilevel study of transformational leadership, identification, and follower outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
243
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(251 citation statements)
references
References 97 publications
(204 reference statements)
5
243
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…intrinsic motivation, creative self-efficacy), we studied how transformational leadership influences employee creativity by shaping a social context that is conducive to creativity. The finding that transformational leadership had an indirect effect on creative process engagement via psychological safety climate lends empirical support to the theoretical notions that leadership is a multilevel process (Kozlowski & Bell, 2003) and employee behaviors are subject to the influence of ambient or environmental stimuli (Hackman, 1992;Kirkman et al, 2009;Wang & Howell, 2012). By emphasizing the interpersonal interaction context, this finding adds a unique angle in the understanding of the process through which transformational leadership influences creativity and highlights the importance of examining the role of contextual variables in the transformational leadership-creativity relationship.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…intrinsic motivation, creative self-efficacy), we studied how transformational leadership influences employee creativity by shaping a social context that is conducive to creativity. The finding that transformational leadership had an indirect effect on creative process engagement via psychological safety climate lends empirical support to the theoretical notions that leadership is a multilevel process (Kozlowski & Bell, 2003) and employee behaviors are subject to the influence of ambient or environmental stimuli (Hackman, 1992;Kirkman et al, 2009;Wang & Howell, 2012). By emphasizing the interpersonal interaction context, this finding adds a unique angle in the understanding of the process through which transformational leadership influences creativity and highlights the importance of examining the role of contextual variables in the transformational leadership-creativity relationship.…”
Section: Theoretical Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Chen et al, 2007;Kirkman, Chen, Farh, Chen, & Lowe, 2009;Shin, Kim, Lee, & Bian, 2012;Wang & Howell, 2012). Although theorists have long suggested that the group level factors may influence employee creativity (Drazin, Glynn, & Kazanjian, 1999;Woodman, Sawyer, & Griffin, 1993), research has yet to examine how transformational leadership at the group level influences the individual-level creative process engagement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transformational leaders are more likely to engage in proactive activities (Joo & Lim, 2013). They will work hard to change the organizational culture and implement new ideas (Wang & Howell, 2012). Transformational leadership recognizes the need for change, creates a new vision, and then institutionalizes the change (Eisenbach, Watson, & Pillai, 1999).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, researchers point out that there is a positive relationship between transformational leadership and work performance (Bono & Judge, 2003;Choi, 2006;Mullen & Kelloway, 2010;Senthamil & Palanichamy, 2011;Walumbwa et al, 2008;Wang & Howell, 2012). Moreover, Podsakoff et al (1996) suggest that individualized support, and fostering the acceptance of group goals have a significant effect on employee in-role performance.…”
Section: The Influence Of Transformational Leadership On Work Performmentioning
confidence: 99%