2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Linking Metadiscursive Elements in Two Opencourseware Lectures (MOOCs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, only lectures from the middle of the courses were selected. As argued in Bernad-Mechó (2015), lectures at the beginning or end of courses might contain higher amounts of previewing and reviewing metadiscourse respectively, as they usually serve as introductions and conclusions to entire courses. And second, an initial identification of metadiscursive instances was conducted.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, only lectures from the middle of the courses were selected. As argued in Bernad-Mechó (2015), lectures at the beginning or end of courses might contain higher amounts of previewing and reviewing metadiscourse respectively, as they usually serve as introductions and conclusions to entire courses. And second, an initial identification of metadiscursive instances was conducted.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Secondly, the teaching of MOOCbased courses needs to change the idea of hierarchical teaching. Teachers need to fully understand the role of individuals in mixed teaching in the process of listening and speaking [3] .The initiative of the activity and the test of the MOOC learning effect are given to the students, so that the students can subjectively recognize the initiative of the communication, become the participants of the offline activities, and change the thinking of correcting mistakes in the classroom teaching. At the same time, teachers can communicate and communicate with students online through the MOOC platform, thus alleviating the tension of students during face-to-face communication.…”
Section: Learning Emotional Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jones, Chik, and Hafner, (2015) in Discourse and digital practices: Doing discourse analysis in the digital age maintain that "in some cases, the tools that have been developed for face-to-face conversation and writing in print media can be easily adapted to analyze online conversations and texts" (p. 8). Even though the value of the analysis of discussion forum posts has certain limits due to the fact that online participants are registered users of the MOOC in question, some statements are useful to bring to light the style and relationship between learners´ expectations and the new learning digital platform content and instructional design (see also, Anbalagan, Kumar, & Bijlani, 2015;Bernad-Mechó, 2015). All in all, the study of digitally-mediated communication in some ways forces us to rethink our very definitions of terms such as text, context, interaction, satisfaction, and power (Gardner & Brooks, 2018;Gee & Handford, 2011;Woods, 2006).…”
Section: Discourse Analysis Of Conversations At Mooc Platforms On Moocsmentioning
confidence: 99%