2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.05.03.442450
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multimodal study of a first episode psychosis cohort: potential markers of antipsychotic treatment resistance

Abstract: Treatment resistant (TR) psychosis is considered to be a significant cause of disability and functional impairment. Numerous efforts have been made to identify the clinical predictors of TR. However, the exploration of molecular and biological markers is still at an early stage. To understand the TR condition and identify potential molecular and biological markers, we analyzed demographic information, clinical data, structural brain imaging data, and molecular brain imaging data in 7 Tesla magnetic resonance s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To demonstrate the validity and utility of ONCs as surrogate neuronal cells, in the present study, we used clinical data and biospecimens collected from study participants recruited by clinical cohorts [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] established at Johns Hopkins Schizophrenia Center under approval of the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Boards. All study participants provided written informed consent.…”
Section: Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To demonstrate the validity and utility of ONCs as surrogate neuronal cells, in the present study, we used clinical data and biospecimens collected from study participants recruited by clinical cohorts [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] established at Johns Hopkins Schizophrenia Center under approval of the Johns Hopkins Medicine Institutional Review Boards. All study participants provided written informed consent.…”
Section: Study Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%