2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-002-1464-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiobjective genetic algorithm for scheduling a flexible manufacturing system

Abstract: Though the designers of Flexible Manufacturing Systems (FMS) strive to ensure the maximum flexibility in the system, in practice, after the implementation of such systems the operational executives often find it hard to accommodate frequent variations in the part designs of incoming jobs. This difficulty can very well be overcome by scheduling the variety of incoming parts into the system efficiently. In this work an appropriate scheduling mechanism is designed to generate a nearerto-optimum schedule using Gen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…x v x (10) y v y (11) where v x and v y are the velocity of the AS/R vehicle along x and y (as defined in Fig. 1); (x, y) i is the location of slot i. Batch xy rearrangement is based on the following Chebyshev distance:…”
Section: Results and Factorial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…x v x (10) y v y (11) where v x and v y are the velocity of the AS/R vehicle along x and y (as defined in Fig. 1); (x, y) i is the location of slot i. Batch xy rearrangement is based on the following Chebyshev distance:…”
Section: Results and Factorial Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They present algorithms and procedures to support the optimization (e.g., storage allocation of materials, storage and retrieval sequencing) of the whole production system [7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Literature Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue begets higher complexity for the FMS scheduling and makes its complexity rise to (n!) m and belongs to the class of problems as NP-hard (Liu and MacCarthy 1997;Sankar, Ponnanbalam, and Rajendran 2003;Taghavifard, Heydar, and Mousavi 2009). It requires an exponential time to be solved in optimality.…”
Section: Complexity Of the Fms Scheduling Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison, using a meta-heuristic optimizer, such as a genetic algorithm (GA), to generate the optimal schedules directly, which is referred as a direct approach in this paper, may be advantageous if searching for ''optimal'' solutions is desired. There are many studies that compare these two approaches and some of them provide results showing the use of GAs to generate detailed schedules that can obtain better solutions [8,9] than those ones obtained using PDRs. Methods that combine GA and PDR, meaning that the GA search for the optimal combination of PDRs, can be found in [10,11] and will be referred to as the indirect approach in this paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%