2016
DOI: 10.1109/tcst.2015.2454444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiobjective Optimization Framework for Online Stochastic Optimal Control in Hybrid Electric Vehicles

Abstract: The increasing urgency to extract additional efficiency from hybrid propulsion systems has led to the development of advanced power management control algorithms. In this paper, we address the problem of online optimization of the supervisory power management control in parallel hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs). We model HEV operation as a controlled Markov chain and show that the control policy yielding the Pareto optimal solution minimizes online the long-run expected average cost per unit time criterion. The… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, through the proposed approach, we consider minimizing the control input (acceleration/deceleration though the gas/brake pedal position) that results in minimizing transient engine operation. If we minimize transient engine operation, we have direct benefits in fuel consumption [5] and emissions since internal combustion engines are optimized over steady state operating points (constant torque and speed) [27], [28]. Fuel consumption was quantified by using the polynomial metamodel proposed in [36] which yields vehicle fuel consumption as a function of speed, v(t), and control input, u(t), namelẏ…”
Section: Simulation Framework and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, through the proposed approach, we consider minimizing the control input (acceleration/deceleration though the gas/brake pedal position) that results in minimizing transient engine operation. If we minimize transient engine operation, we have direct benefits in fuel consumption [5] and emissions since internal combustion engines are optimized over steady state operating points (constant torque and speed) [27], [28]. Fuel consumption was quantified by using the polynomial metamodel proposed in [36] which yields vehicle fuel consumption as a function of speed, v(t), and control input, u(t), namelẏ…”
Section: Simulation Framework and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the speed of each vehicle is reduced, the throughput at the speed reduction zone is maximized. Moreover, by minimizibg the acceleration/deceleration of each vehicle, we minimize transient engine operation, thus we can have direct benefits in fuel consumption [5] and emissions since internal combustion engines are optimized over steady state operating points (constant torque and speed) [27], [28].…”
Section: B Optimal Control Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in [93] to minimize the discounted infinite-horizon cost, and in [94,95] in a shortest path formulation. A stochastic optimal control framework is developed in [96,97] to determine the policy minimizing the long-run expected average cost. All formulations yield a causal, time-invariant, state-feedback controller that can be fairly easily implemented.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal control is a standard approach to adjustment of such inconsistent objectives with restrictions. However, it balances conflicting objectives and does not allow simultaneous achievement of both objectives [19], [20]. Another approach is the use of consistent trajectories for the velocity and force [21], where the position trajectory is calculated from the required force reference.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…,(11),(15),(16),(20),(21),(25),(26),(30),(31),(35), and(36), where R = 1 + H−1 v Z e . The transfer functions show the achievement of the control objectives in…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%