2006 Fifth International Conference on Grid and Cooperative Computing Workshops 2006
DOI: 10.1109/gccw.2006.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Multiobjective Resources Scheduling Approach Based on Genetic Algorithms in Grid Environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later these Metaheuristics were compared against a MOEA algorithm, optimizing the makespan and flowtime objective functions. In [8], the authors propose an algorithm called Multi-Objective Resource Scheduling Approach-MORSA, which is a combination between NPGA and NSGA Algorithms. They combine the sorting algorithm of non-dominated solutions with the process of Niche Sharing to ensure diversity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later these Metaheuristics were compared against a MOEA algorithm, optimizing the makespan and flowtime objective functions. In [8], the authors propose an algorithm called Multi-Objective Resource Scheduling Approach-MORSA, which is a combination between NPGA and NSGA Algorithms. They combine the sorting algorithm of non-dominated solutions with the process of Niche Sharing to ensure diversity.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the other notable list heuristics consider different user-and systemcentric objectives like execution time (makespan) [23][24][25], resource utilization [26], reliability [27,28] and total economic cost [29,30] as independent scheduling criteria. Some isolated approaches try to optimize across multiple criteria [31][32][33].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, there exist several works using multi-objective optimization algorithms for the problem of mapping tasks on Grids, either considering dependencies between tasks [28], [29], deadlines [30], or static allocation of independent tasks [31], [32], [33], as the problem considered in this paper. However, these papers are considering objectives such as the resource utilization, the completion time of the resources, or the total execution time, but none is considering the robustness of the system as we do in this work.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%