2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-018-0613-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiobjective sensor placement optimization for SHM systems considering Fisher information matrix and mode shape interpolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The set of feasible solutions X is obtained by applying equality, inequality and bound constraint on Rn depending upon the nature of the optimization problem. The vector function f (x) consists of j objective functions and set Rn is termed as variable decision space (Gomes et al, 2018; Jaimes et al, 2009).…”
Section: Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The set of feasible solutions X is obtained by applying equality, inequality and bound constraint on Rn depending upon the nature of the optimization problem. The vector function f (x) consists of j objective functions and set Rn is termed as variable decision space (Gomes et al, 2018; Jaimes et al, 2009).…”
Section: Fundamentalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these approaches, sensor locations have been ranked based on their ability to assess model-parameter values. Other researchers have used modal properties to estimate sensor utility for structural identification based on Fisher Information Matrix [34], modal assurance criterion [35], frequency-response functions [36] and a combination of above-mentioned criteria [37]. Nevertheless, these metrics can only be used for dynamic load testing, while entropy-based metrics, such as the approach used in this paper, are also applicable to static load tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dai and Ji (2015) put forward the effective independence-average modal kinetic/strained energy coefficient methods and introduced a weight coefficient reflecting the contribution proportion of a higher-order model. Gomes et al (2019) adopted multi-objective genetic algorithm to search the position of sensors, and proposed a multi-objective optimization function combining Fisher information matrix (FIM) and mode interpolation information. Lin et al (2019) developed a multi-objective OSP method based on response covariance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%