2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2006.05.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A multiple fracture model of pre-seismic electromagnetic phenomena

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 1. The earthquakes occurrence in Japan and their pre-seismic geomagnetic signature illustrated in Fig.5 and Fig.6 EMSC -European Mediterranean Seismological Centre; M -earthquake magnitude; ED -epicentral distance related to MMB and KAK; R*-epicentral distance at which the pre-seismic effect is felt, according to [15]; the dark grey rows emphasise the earthquakes with ED≤R*.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 1. The earthquakes occurrence in Japan and their pre-seismic geomagnetic signature illustrated in Fig.5 and Fig.6 EMSC -European Mediterranean Seismological Centre; M -earthquake magnitude; ED -epicentral distance related to MMB and KAK; R*-epicentral distance at which the pre-seismic effect is felt, according to [15]; the dark grey rows emphasise the earthquakes with ED≤R*.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MMB, KAK and PS observatories have the geographic coordinates (43°54'36" N, 144°11'9" E), (36°13'56" N, 140°11'11" E) and (45 0 9'21" N, 25 0 37'45" E), being located towards north-east, south-west and far north-west, respectively, of the M9.0 earthquake epicentre, as shown in Fig.2, and the criteria of selection are: (i) Possibility to obtain geomagnetic data at MMB and KAK via internet (www.intermagnet.org) and in real-time for the PS; (ii) Long-range effect of strain-related to the pre-seismic geomagnetic signature obtained by using the approach R*[km] = 10 0.5M-0.27 , as in [15], where R* is the epicentral distance and M is the earthquake magnitude (in our case M=9 and R* ≈ 17,000km); (iii) Possibility to investigate the dimensionality characteristics of the geoelectric structure under the measuring sites (MMB, KAK and PS) and to identify the frequency range for which (1) is valid. For the PS observatory, the dimensionality characteristics of the geoelectric structure were investigated by using single-site magnetotelluric tensor impedance decomposition [1] and, applying the MAPROS software packages [22], it was shown that in the frequency range 0.001-0.0166 Hz the skewness values are less than 0.3, what means that the geoelectric structure is of 2-D type, having a strike orientation of about N96 0 E. Thus, to satisfy (1), at the PS observatory one of the horizontal geomagnetic components is always orientated perpendicular to the geoelectric strike of the Carpathian Electrical Conductivity Anomaly (CECA), which on the Romanian territory is delineated by the divergence zone of the induction arrows, Wiese convention [19].…”
Section: Geomagnetic Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If in relation (3) it is assumed that the Earth's lithosphere has an average conductivity of about 10 -2 S/m and f = 0.001 Hz (minimum value in ULF range), then the geomagnetic signal generated in Vrancea's seismogenic volume, at about 160 km depth, can reach to the GOPS. To identify the distance for pre-seismic signal detection, depending on the earthquake magnitude, we used the Morgunov and Malzev (2007) relation:…”
Section: Basic Concept Of the Geomagnetic Precursormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical phenomena and fractal characteristics of EMR have been observed before seismic or rock fracture Rabinovitch et al, 2001;Kapiris et al, 2003;Uritsky et al, 2004;Kapiris et al, 2004a, b;Gotoh et al, 2004;Eftaxias et al, 2007;Muto et al, 2007). Some scholars have considered that the critical phenomena of EM emission are related to crack opening and expansion, as well as fractal structure Nanjo and Nagahama, 2004a, b;Kapiris et al, 2004a, b;Morgounov and Malzev, 2007;Kawada et al, 2007;Minadakis et al, 2012). Uritsky et al (2004) proposed a simple framework for modeling ultra-low frequency (ULF) electromagnetic emission signals associated with abrupt changes in the large-scale geometry of stress distribution before characteristic seismic events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%